OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the impact of highly asymmetric stent expansion after sirolimus-eluting stent(SES)implantation on clinical outcomes from post procedure to 12 months later. METHODS: Subjects were 118 patients with 171 lesions who underwent SES implantation for angina pectoris and were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) following the procedure. The stent symmetry index (minimal stent diameter/maximal stent diameter) at the minimal stent area was calculated by IVUS analysis. The patients were divided into two groups for comparative study: those with stent symmetry index > or = 0.7 were classified into the optimal (O) group (93 patients; 145 lesions, mean age 66 +/- 12 years) and those with stent symmetry index < 0.7 were the sub-optimal (S) group (25 patients; 26 lesions, mean age 67 +/- 10 years). RESULTS: Angiographic follow up after 8 months showed no differences in target lesion revascularization (TLR) (O group: 3.1% vs S group: 3.8%, p = 0.833). Multivariate analysis identified the post minimal stent diameter as the independent predictor of TLR (p = 0.038). The stent symmetry index < 0.7 was not a predictor of TLR (p = 0.887). Clinical outcomes after 12 months showed both groups had 0% stent thrombosis and there were no differences in deaths (O group: 2.1% vs S group: 4.0%, p = 0.602). CONCLUSIONS: Highly asymmetric stent expansion after SES implantation may not have a negative impact on clinical outcomes at 12 months.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the impact of highly asymmetric stent expansion after sirolimus-eluting stent(SES)implantation on clinical outcomes from post procedure to 12 months later. METHODS: Subjects were 118 patients with 171 lesions who underwent SES implantation for angina pectoris and were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) following the procedure. The stent symmetry index (minimal stent diameter/maximal stent diameter) at the minimal stent area was calculated by IVUS analysis. The patients were divided into two groups for comparative study: those with stent symmetry index > or = 0.7 were classified into the optimal (O) group (93 patients; 145 lesions, mean age 66 +/- 12 years) and those with stent symmetry index < 0.7 were the sub-optimal (S) group (25 patients; 26 lesions, mean age 67 +/- 10 years). RESULTS: Angiographic follow up after 8 months showed no differences in target lesion revascularization (TLR) (O group: 3.1% vs S group: 3.8%, p = 0.833). Multivariate analysis identified the post minimal stent diameter as the independent predictor of TLR (p = 0.038). The stent symmetry index < 0.7 was not a predictor of TLR (p = 0.887). Clinical outcomes after 12 months showed both groups had 0% stent thrombosis and there were no differences in deaths (O group: 2.1% vs S group: 4.0%, p = 0.602). CONCLUSIONS: Highly asymmetric stent expansion after SES implantation may not have a negative impact on clinical outcomes at 12 months.