OBJECT: Previous reports of redundant nerve roots (RNRs) of the cauda equina have been limited to evaluations based on myelography. Neither the imaging nor the clinical features of RNRs in relation to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have been elaborated. The MR imaging characteristics of RNRs were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score before and after the surgery. METHODS: There were 44 patients with L4-5 spondylolisthesis in which a complete blockage was demonstrated on myelography. All patients underwent posterior L4-5 interbody fusion. Based the myelographic and MR imaging findings, the patients were stratified into the following three groups: RNRs recognized on both myelographic and MR imaging (Group A); RNRs recognized on myelography but not very evident on MR imaging (Group B); and RNRs not recognized on either myelographic or MR imaging (Group C). Among these three groups, pre- and postoperative clinical symptoms were compared. RESULTS: There were 16 patients in Group A, 14 in Group B, and 14 in Group C. In terms of preoperative clinical symptoms, there was a significant difference between Groups A and C in the incidence of leg pain and tingling sensation. Significant differences were also noted between Groups A and C and between Groups B and C in ambulatory ability. Evaluation of postoperative clinical symptoms showed a significant difference between Groups A and C in ambulatory ability. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MR imaging evidence of RNRs presented with more severe clinical symptoms. It is believed that the RNR features derived from MR images represent important findings.
OBJECT: Previous reports of redundant nerve roots (RNRs) of the cauda equina have been limited to evaluations based on myelography. Neither the imaging nor the clinical features of RNRs in relation to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have been elaborated. The MR imaging characteristics of RNRs were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score before and after the surgery. METHODS: There were 44 patients with L4-5 spondylolisthesis in which a complete blockage was demonstrated on myelography. All patients underwent posterior L4-5 interbody fusion. Based the myelographic and MR imaging findings, the patients were stratified into the following three groups: RNRs recognized on both myelographic and MR imaging (Group A); RNRs recognized on myelography but not very evident on MR imaging (Group B); and RNRs not recognized on either myelographic or MR imaging (Group C). Among these three groups, pre- and postoperative clinical symptoms were compared. RESULTS: There were 16 patients in Group A, 14 in Group B, and 14 in Group C. In terms of preoperative clinical symptoms, there was a significant difference between Groups A and C in the incidence of leg pain and tingling sensation. Significant differences were also noted between Groups A and C and between Groups B and C in ambulatory ability. Evaluation of postoperative clinical symptoms showed a significant difference between Groups A and C in ambulatory ability. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with MR imaging evidence of RNRs presented with more severe clinical symptoms. It is believed that the RNR features derived from MR images represent important findings.
Authors: Gursukhman S Sidhu; Erik Henkelman; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert; Alan Hilibrand; D Greg Anderson; Jeffrey A Rihn Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Hasan Banitalebi; Ansgar Espeland; Masoud Anvar; Erland Hermansen; Christian Hellum; Jens Ivar Brox; Tor Åge Myklebust; Kari Indrekvam; Helena Brisby; Clemens Weber; Jørn Aaen; Ivar Magne Austevoll; Oliver Grundnes; Anne Negård Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2022-01-15 Impact factor: 2.362