Ashley P Tregaskiss1, Adam N Goodwin, Robert D Acland. 1. Louisville, Ky. From the Christine M. Kleinert Institute for Hand and Microsurgery and the Department of Surgery, University of Louisville.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abdominal perforator flaps represent a natural progression in the quest to minimize abdominal wall morbidity. Their one disadvantage is the significant rate of vascular complications to which they are subject in some series. The authors examined the vascular anatomy of the abdominal integument, to determine why such complications occur and how they may be prevented. METHODS: In 10 fresh cadavers, major arteries supplying the abdominal wall were injected with a lead-based contrast medium. The abdominal integument of each cadaver was imaged using a 16-slice spiral computed tomography scanner, to produce three-dimensional reconstructions of the arterial anatomy. Reconstructions were observed for orientation, course, and morphology of the major perforators within the abdominal integument. RESULTS: Perforators of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) varied markedly in their orientation, course, and morphology among specimens. By contrast, perforators of the superior epigastric artery (SEA) were relatively consistent in their morphology and orientation. In eight of 10 specimens, SEA perforators with extensive anatomical "territories" orientated toward the umbilicus were present. These SEA perforators pierced the rectus sheath within 4 cm of the costal margin and were present bilaterally in seven of eight specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The unpredictable orientation and course of DIEA perforators indicate that the blood supply of abdominal perforator flaps, raised without clear knowledge of their unique vascular anatomy, may often be more random than axial. This may account for much of the ischemia-related morbidity observed with DIEA-based perforator flaps. Preservation of SEA perforators adjacent to the costal margin during abdominoplasty will likely improve abdominal wall perfusion and reduce donor-site morbidity.
BACKGROUND: Abdominal perforator flaps represent a natural progression in the quest to minimize abdominal wall morbidity. Their one disadvantage is the significant rate of vascular complications to which they are subject in some series. The authors examined the vascular anatomy of the abdominal integument, to determine why such complications occur and how they may be prevented. METHODS: In 10 fresh cadavers, major arteries supplying the abdominal wall were injected with a lead-based contrast medium. The abdominal integument of each cadaver was imaged using a 16-slice spiral computed tomography scanner, to produce three-dimensional reconstructions of the arterial anatomy. Reconstructions were observed for orientation, course, and morphology of the major perforators within the abdominal integument. RESULTS: Perforators of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) varied markedly in their orientation, course, and morphology among specimens. By contrast, perforators of the superior epigastric artery (SEA) were relatively consistent in their morphology and orientation. In eight of 10 specimens, SEA perforators with extensive anatomical "territories" orientated toward the umbilicus were present. These SEA perforators pierced the rectus sheath within 4 cm of the costal margin and were present bilaterally in seven of eight specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The unpredictable orientation and course of DIEA perforators indicate that the blood supply of abdominal perforator flaps, raised without clear knowledge of their unique vascular anatomy, may often be more random than axial. This may account for much of the ischemia-related morbidity observed with DIEA-based perforator flaps. Preservation of SEA perforators adjacent to the costal margin during abdominoplasty will likely improve abdominal wall perfusion and reduce donor-site morbidity.
Authors: Dana Egozi; Vladimir Perkhulov; Liza Kouniavsky; Anais Di Via Loschope; Michal Benkler; David Benharush Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-03-28