Literature DB >> 17632314

A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use.

Sotiris Plainis1, Paraskevi Tzatzala, Yiannis Orphanos, Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The log MAR visual acuity (VA) chart developed for use in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) is composed of 10 Sloan letters, which are not used in the Greek, Cyrillic, and Central European alphabets. In this study we evaluate a modified ETDRS chart, the University of Crete (UoC) chart, which contains a set of letters readable by all European citizens.
METHODS: In the UoC charts, the letters C, D, R, N, V, S, and Z were substituted with E, P, B, X, Y, A, and T, respectively. The similarity between the modified and the standard acuity charts was evaluated using two procedures. First, VA of 227 secondary school children (454 eyes) was evaluated using both sets of charts. Second, the relative difficulty for the identification of individual Sloan letters used in both charts, as well as letter M, was assessed from psychometric functions for five subjects.
RESULTS: Bland-Altman plots revealed no statistical significant differences in the value of VA between the standard and the UoC set of charts. Although, estimates of identification log MAR threshold showed relatively significant interletter variability, in total, the new set of Sloan letters was equally identifiable with the original set.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall pattern of results suggests that the modified log MAR UoC charts forms a valid alternative to the ETDRS for assessing VA in multinational clinical trials, offering the advantage of containing letters recognizable by a wider population basis, such as European citizens, as well as subjects from countries using the Cyrillic alphabet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17632314     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3180dc9a60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  10 in total

1.  Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Michael Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Is conversion of decimal visual acuity measurements to logMAR values reliable?

Authors:  Asimina Mataftsi; Dimitrios Koutsimpogeorgos; Periklis Brazitikos; Nikolaos Ziakas; Anna-Bettina Haidich
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Preoperative evaluation of human crystalline lens hardness using A-scan ultrasound biometry: a pilot study.

Authors:  Konstantinos T Tsaousis; Lampros P Lamprogiannis; Stavros A Dimitrakos; Ioannis T Tsinopoulos
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Measuring Visual Function Using the MultiQuity System: Comparison with an Established Device.

Authors:  Patrycja Smolarek-Kasprzak; John M Nolan; Stephen Beatty; Jessica Dennison; Kwadwo Owusu Akuffo; Robert Kuchling; Jim Stack; Graham O'Regan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  A standardized logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity chart in Hindi.

Authors:  Ananth Sailoganathan; Ebi Peter Osuobeni; John Siderov
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  The effect of astigmatic axis on visual acuity measured with different alphabets in Roman alphabet readers.

Authors:  Pedro M Serra; Michael J Cox; Catharine M Chisholm
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 7.  Recent Advances of Computerized Graphical Methods for the Detection and Progress Assessment of Visual Distortion Caused by Macular Disorders.

Authors:  Navid Mohaghegh; Ebrahim Ghafar-Zadeh; Sebastian Magierowski
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-05

8.  Psychophysical Validation of a Novel Active Learning Approach for Measuring the Visual Acuity Behavioral Function.

Authors:  Yukai Zhao; Luis Andres Lesmes; Michael Dorr; Peter J Bex; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Saving space: Comparing mini - logMAR with standard logMAR visual acuity.

Authors:  Farnaz Kauser; Abadan K Amitava; Juhi Saxena; S Aisha Raza; Anam Masood; Md Shahid Alam
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Teaming-up nurses with ophthalmologists to expand the reach of eye care in a middle-income country: Validation of health data acquisition by nursing staff in a telemedicine strategy.

Authors:  Cassia Garcia Moraes Pagano; Tais de Campos Moreira; Daniel Sganzerla; Ana Maria Frölich Matzenbacher; Amanda Gomes Faria; Lucas Matturro; Felipe Cezar Cabral; Dimitris Rucks Varvaki Rados; Anelise Decavata Szortyka; Maicon Falavigna; Maria Eulalia Vinadé Chagas; Erno Harzheim; Marcelo Gonçalves; Roberto Umpierre; Aline Lutz de Araujo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.