Literature DB >> 17632151

Factors influencing the outcome of mid urethral sling procedures for female urinary incontinence.

Jae-Seung Paick1, Min Chul Cho, Seung-June Oh, Soo Woong Kim, Ja Hyeon Ku.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the outcome at least 6 months after the tension-free vaginal tape or transobturator tape procedure in women with urinary incontinence, and identified factors predicting persistent stress urinary incontinence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 464 women 28 to 80 years old (mean age 56) were included in the study. Tension-free vaginal tape (252) and transobturator tape (212) procedures were performed by the same surgeon. Mean followup was 10.8 months (range 6 to 52).
RESULTS: Bladder perforations were noted in 12 patients (4.8%) in the tension-free vaginal tape group but there was no bladder perforation after the transobturator tape procedure (p = 0.001). The rate of urinary retention in the tension-free vaginal tape group was significantly higher than that in the transobturator tape group (15.1% vs 6.6%, p = 0.004). The overall cure rate was significantly higher in the tension-free vaginal tape group than in the transobturator tape group (92.1% vs 84.9%, p = 0.015). On multivariate analysis 4 variables were independent risk factors for persistent stress urinary incontinence, that is comorbid disease (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.26-4.47, p = 0.008), urge urinary incontinence (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.02-3.74, p = 0.044), severe grade of cystocele (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.43-5.20, p = 0.002) and transobturator tape procedure (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.50-5.47, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The cure rates in women with urinary incontinence are not similar after tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedures. Our findings suggest that characteristics including the type of procedure, comorbid diseases, mixed urinary incontinence and severe grade cystocele should be considered high risk factors for persistent stress urinary incontinence in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17632151     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  Influence of TVT properties on outcomes of midurethral sling procedures: high-stiffness versus low-stiffness tape.

Authors:  Jens Christian Prien-Larsen; Thomas Prien-Larsen; Lars Cieslak; Ram B Dessau
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Body mass index does not influence the outcome of anti-incontinence surgery among women whereas menopausal status and ageing do: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Tomasz Rechberger; Konrad Futyma; Katarzyna Jankiewicz; Aneta Adamiak; Michał Bogusiewicz; Paweł Skorupski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Minimally invasive treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 100 cases using SPARC sling.

Authors:  K Siddiqui; H Raj; R J Flynn; R Grainger; J A Thornhill
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: analysis of learning curve, perioperative changes of voiding function.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Hiroyuki Yamanaka; Masayuki Hagiwara; Toru Furuuchi; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Kunimitsu Kanai; Kiichiro Kodaira; Akiharu Ninomiya; So Nakamura
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral synthetic slings: does one sling fit all?

Authors:  Sarah E McAchran
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Comparing the risk of urethrolysis for the treatment of voiding dysfunction between two retropubic mesh slings: a case-control study.

Authors:  Amie Kawasaki; Autumn L Edenfield; Anthony G Visco; Jennifer M Wu; Daniel Westreich; Nazema Y Siddiqui
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Preoperative Valsalva voiding increases the risk of urinary retention after midurethral sling placement.

Authors:  Khanh N Pham; Nicole Topp; Michael L Guralnick; Sumana Koduri; Julianne R Newcomer; Robert Corey O'Connor
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Demographic and clinical predictors of treatment failure one year after midurethral sling surgery.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Heather J Litman; Emily S Lukacz; Larry T Sirls; Leslie Rickey; Peggy Norton; Gary E Lemack; Stephen Kraus; Pamela Moalli; Mary Pat Fitzgerald; Kimberly J Dandreo; Liyuan Huang; John W Kusek
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Surgical management of female SUI: is there a gold standard?

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Sender Herschorn; Livia Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  Kobi Stav; Peter L Dwyer; Anna Rosamilia; Lore Schierlitz; Yik N Lim; Joseph Lee
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.