Literature DB >> 1763168

Symptom-positively and -negatively worded items in two popular self-report inventories of anxiety and depression.

J Mook1, W C Kleijn, H M van der Ploeg.   

Abstract

Substantially higher mean scores on symptom-negatively versus symptom-positively worded items have consistently been reported in the literature for the balanced State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. In this study we aimed to replicate and extend these findings to Dutch trait versions of the inventory and Zung's similarly balanced Self-rating Depression Scale. Analysis indicated significantly higher mean subscale scores for symptom-negative as opposed to symptom-positive items of both measures, across sexes and age groups as well as across different levels of distress in nonclinical (n = 863), subclinical (n = 450), and clinical subject samples (n = 96). Sex and age differences were mainly confirmed to symptom-positive subscales. Scale intercorrelations were lowest between symptom-positively and symptom-negatively worded scales both within and across measures. Factor analyzing the combined measures identified a symptom-negative and a symptom-positive factor, tentatively labeled "absence of positive affect" and "presence of negative affect." Several explanations of the findings among which item-intensity specificity, the response style of social desirability, and the trait model of positive and negative affectivity are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1763168     DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.2.551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  3 in total

1.  A community-based study of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the English (UK) and Chinese (HK) SF-36 in Singapore.

Authors:  J Thumboo; K Y Fong; D Machin; S P Chan; K H Leon; P H Feng; S T Thio; M L Boe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The Everyday Feeling Questionnaire: the structure and validation of a measure of general psychological well-being and distress.

Authors:  Rudolf Uher; Robert Goodman
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff's psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women.

Authors:  Rosemary A Abbott; George B Ploubidis; Felicia A Huppert; Diana Kuh; Michael E J Wadsworth; Tim J Croudace
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 3.186

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.