Literature DB >> 17631257

The relationship between social factors and attitudes toward conventional and CAM practitioners.

Lisa Conboy1, Ted J Kaptchuk, David M Eisenberg, Bobbie Gottlieb, Delores Acevedo-Garcia.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The research results on the relationship between social factors and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) and conventional practitioners are equivocal. Some researchers theorize a relationship between social factors and attitudes toward providers, with CAM being more attractive to socially and economically marginalized groups.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationships between selected sociodemographic factors and attitudes toward CAMs in the general US population.
DESIGN: A subset of data from a 1997-1998 nationally representative survey was examined using descriptive and univariate analyses.
RESULTS: Five outcomes exploring preference for CAM or conventional medical practitioners are considered. Age was positively related to favoring one's conventional medical doctor. Subjects who reported using CAM for wellness/prevention reported significantly less confidence in their conventional doctors than individuals who did not report using CAM for wellness/prevention. Those with low income were also significantly less confident in their medical doctors and less satisfied with their conventional medical practitioners than those with higher incomes.
CONCLUSIONS: While more prospective work is needed, this analysis suggests that social factors may be related to practitioner preference. Finding out why these relationships exist is important for the effectiveness of health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17631257     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2006.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Clin Pract        ISSN: 1744-3881            Impact factor:   2.446


  6 in total

Review 1.  Great expectations: what do patients using complementary and alternative medicine hope for?

Authors:  E Ernst; S K Hung
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Oral complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use varies across chronic conditions and attitudes to risk.

Authors:  Robert J Adams; Sarah L Appleton; Antonia Cole; Tiffany K Gill; Anne W Taylor; Catherine L Hill
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Interprofessional Communication-A Call for More Education to Ensure Cultural Competency in the Context of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine.

Authors:  Jennifer Hunter PhD MScPH BMed; Iman Majd Md Ms; Matthew Kowalski Dc; Joanna E Harnett PhD MHSc BHSc
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2021-05-03

4.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine among asthmatic patients in primary care clinics in Malaysia.

Authors:  Mustafa Ahmed Alshagga; Sami Abdo Al-Dubai; Siti Summayyah Muhamad Faiq; Ahmad Asmadi Yusuf
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.219

5.  "It Works for Me": Pseudotherapy Use is Associated With Trust in Their Efficacy Rather Than Belief in Their Scientific Validity.

Authors:  Gregorio Segovia; Belén Sanz-Barbero
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.100

6.  Incommensurable worldviews? Is public use of complementary and alternative medicines incompatible with support for science and conventional medicine?

Authors:  Paul Stoneman; Patrick Sturgis; Nick Allum; Elissa Sibley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.