Literature DB >> 17631034

Visualizing multiple organ failure: a method for analyzing temporal and dynamic relations between failing systems and interventions.

Yusuf Alper Kiliç, Kaya Yorganci, Iskender Sayek.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17631034      PMCID: PMC2206481          DOI: 10.1186/cc5941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

Multiple organ failure is common among critically ill patients who have a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit or die. Apart from causing significant morbidity and mortality, the treatment for multiple organ failure requires use of limited and costly resources. Although the epidemiology and progression of multiple organ failure are well described, it is not possible to conduct detailed and reliable analyses of the temporal relations between failing organs and the effects of interventions (for instance, institution of antibiotic therapy or surgery). In addition, progression of multiple organ failure may differ between patient populations [1]. We describe a method that allows evaluation of the temporal and dynamic nature of multiple organ failure. We developed this approach by using multiple organ failure scores (Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score [MODS], Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score [LODS] and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA]) stored in our critical care database [2-5]. Using these scores, we have constructed a surface topogram of organ failure for the entire stay in the intensive care unit, using the open source data visualization software OpenDX Visualization Data Explorer (version 4.4.4) [6]. The software outputs a graphic in which each organ system is represented by a row, and the various degrees of organ failure are represented by different colours ranging (in order of severity) from blue, green and yellow to red (Figure 1). This allows clear and rapid visual identification of changes in organ systems, temporal relations within and between failing organs, and effects of interventions. In most patients in whom disease severity is low, the software outputs a graphic that resembles a smooth sea surface (all blue). In patients with severe disease the graphic resembles a 'stormy sea', which ends with a 'tsunami'. In the given example, exacerbation of organ failure by surgical intervention and relief with abdominal decompression can clearly be identified. Also, worsening and correction of renal function follows parallel changes in cardiac function.
Figure 1

Graphical representation of SOFA scores. Shown is a graphical representation of the evolution over time in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores: a 'stormy' intensive care unit course ending with a 'tsunami'.

Graphical representation of SOFA scores. Shown is a graphical representation of the evolution over time in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores: a 'stormy' intensive care unit course ending with a 'tsunami'. This approach can also be used to conduct quality assessment studies, to evaluate intensive care unit performance and patient safety, and to communicate complicated relations between data arrays. The method is also useful for visualizing concordance and calibration between different organ failure systems (Figure 2). In the second example, compared with MODS and SOFA systems, the LODS system appears to underestimate cardiovascular failure.
Figure 2

Graphical representation of the performance of LOD, SOFA and MODS: cardiovascular system. Shown are data of another patient, illustrating differences between organ failure scores in assessing the cardiovascular system. LODS, Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score; MODS, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

Graphical representation of the performance of LOD, SOFA and MODS: cardiovascular system. Shown are data of another patient, illustrating differences between organ failure scores in assessing the cardiovascular system. LODS, Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score; MODS, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. In conclusion, we believe that this method will be useful in analyzing temporal and dynamic relations within and between failing organ systems and related interventions. We also suggest that this approach could be used as a basis for constructing statistical methods to analyze these relations quantitatively.

Competing interests

YAK is the author and director of the Muavenet Intensive Care Information System, which is an open access, online academic information system. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  3 in total

1.  The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  J L Vincent; R Moreno; J Takala; S Willatts; A De Mendonça; H Bruining; C K Reinhart; P M Suter; L G Thijs
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The Logistic Organ Dysfunction system. A new way to assess organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit. ICU Scoring Group.

Authors:  J R Le Gall; J Klar; S Lemeshow; F Saulnier; C Alberti; A Artigas; D Teres
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome.

Authors:  J C Marshall; D J Cook; N V Christou; G R Bernard; C L Sprung; W J Sibbald
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.598

  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  A novel fuzzy logic inference system for decision support in weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Yusuf Alper Kilic; Ilke Kilic
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Daily estimation of the severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in critically ill children.

Authors:  Stéphane Leteurtre; Alain Duhamel; Bruno Grandbastien; François Proulx; Jacques Cotting; Ronald Gottesman; Ari Joffe; Bendicht Wagner; Philippe Hubert; Alain Martinot; Jacques Lacroix; Francis Leclerc
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Shock - A reappraisal: The holistic approach.

Authors:  Fabrizio Giuseppe Bonanno
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2012-04

4.  Sepsis and multiple organ failure represent a chaotic adaptation to severe stress which must be controlled at nanoscale.

Authors:  Yusuf Alper Kilic; Ilke Kilic; Mesut Tez
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Chaotic nature of sepsis and multiple organ failure cannot be explained by linear statistical methods.

Authors:  Sarah Saliba; Yusuf Alper Kilic; Selman Uranues
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Daily estimation of the severity of organ dysfunctions in critically ill children by using the PELOD-2 score.

Authors:  Stéphane Leteurtre; Alain Duhamel; Valérie Deken; Jacques Lacroix; Francis Leclerc
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.