Literature DB >> 17630677

Carotid artery stent type influences duplex ultrasonography derived peak systolic velocity: findings of an in-vitro model.

Christian Spies1, Ripple Doshi, Jocelyn Spoon, R Jeffrey Snell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of stenting on Doppler ultrasonography (DU) [velocity] signals in an in-vitro carotid model.
BACKGROUND: Considerable debate exists about whether DU overestimates velocity signals and thus the degree of stenosis in previously stented carotid arteries.
METHODS: Constant, pulsatile flow was simulated with an experimental circulatory system containing a nonstenotic ovine internal carotid artery segment. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) and peak diastolic velocity were measured with an intravascular flow wire (FW) and DU. Velocities were evaluated at five predetermined locations within the vessel immediately prior to and following stent placement.
RESULTS: Eleven stents were implanted. DU-derived PSV increased significantly following placement of the X-Act stent (80+/-26 cm/sec [pre] vs. 102+/-29 cm/sec [post], P=0.02), while FW-derived PSV (65+/-23 cm/sec [pre] vs. 66+/-9 cm/sec [post], P=0.93) did not change. The Precise stent did not influence PSV with either method (DU: 76+/-28 cm/sec [pre] vs. 72+/-35 cm/sec [post], P=0.95;), while the Acculink stent showed a trend towards a reduction in DU (69+/-37 cm/sec [pre] vs. 51+/-10 cm/sec [post], P=0.075) and FW (50+/-27 cm/sec [pre] vs. 40+/-12 cm/sec [post], P=0.14) derived PSV. Peak diastolic velocity revealed similar trends as PSV signals depending on the type of stent used.
CONCLUSIONS: Stent type may have significant impact on DU derived velocity signals. DU seems to overestimate PSV in carotid arteries treated with the X-Act stent, but not with the Precise or Acculink stent. Larger scale clinical comparison of various stent types and their impact on DU are needed in order to clarify the value of DU surveillance following carotid artery stenting. Copyright (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17630677     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

1.  Complication rate in unprotected carotid artery stenting with closed-cell stents.

Authors:  Marc W K Tietke; Tina Kerby; Karsten Alfke; Christian Riedel; Axel Rohr; Ulf Jensen; Phillip Zimmermann; Robert Stingele; Olaf Jansen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Morphological and hemodynamic patterns of carotid stenosis treated by endarterectomy with patch closure versus stenting: a duplex ultrasound study.

Authors:  Marcia Maria Morales; Alexandre Anacleto; Marcello Azem Buchdid; Paulo Ricardo Baggio Simeoni; Sergio Ledesma; Crescêncio Cêntola; João Carlos Anacleto; Marcela Aldrovani; Carlos Eli Piccinato
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  In vitro performance of echoPIV for assessment of laminar flow profiles in a carotid artery stent.

Authors:  Astrid M Hoving; Jason Voorneveld; Julia Mikhal; Johan G Bosch; Erik Groot Jebbink; Cornelis H Slump
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 4.  Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries: review and protocol for a diagnostic study.

Authors:  Paul J Nederkoorn; Martin M Brown
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.474

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.