Charles S Cornford1, Angela Hill, Joe Reilly. 1. Centre for Integrated Health Care Research, University of Durham, Queen's Campus, Wolfson Research Institute, University Boulevard, Stockton-on-Tees, TS17 6BH, UK. charles.cornford@durham.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are common in primary care, yet considerable professional controversy exists about appropriate management including the effectiveness of treatments. In addition, avoiding prescribing antidepressants at least initially is recommended. Views of patients themselves should therefore be particularly important in agreeing management strategies. OBJECTIVE: To examine lay beliefs about depressive symptoms in primary care. METHOD: A total of 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients scoring positively for depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score in a primary care setting. RESULTS: Differentiating 'depression' from understandable reactions to adversity was difficult for patients. The wide range of consequences discussed included adverse effects on others, difficulties coping with feeling out of control and loss of self-identity. Negative images of depression, such as depression being a 20th century phenomenon, were pervasive. Views about medication varied. Various management strategies described included strategies of detachment, engagement in activities and 'blotting out' symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' views about depressive symptoms are significantly different from conventional medical views. A 'disease management approach' fits uncomfortably with patients' experiences. Acknowledging feelings of loss of control and loss of self-identity in consultations may be useful. The wide employment of techniques patients use to control their disorders, such as support from others, engagement in activities and working at relationships, may be useful to encourage in consultations as alternatives to the use of antidepressant medication.
BACKGROUND:Depressive symptoms are common in primary care, yet considerable professional controversy exists about appropriate management including the effectiveness of treatments. In addition, avoiding prescribing antidepressants at least initially is recommended. Views of patients themselves should therefore be particularly important in agreeing management strategies. OBJECTIVE: To examine lay beliefs about depressive symptoms in primary care. METHOD: A total of 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients scoring positively for depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score in a primary care setting. RESULTS: Differentiating 'depression' from understandable reactions to adversity was difficult for patients. The wide range of consequences discussed included adverse effects on others, difficulties coping with feeling out of control and loss of self-identity. Negative images of depression, such as depression being a 20th century phenomenon, were pervasive. Views about medication varied. Various management strategies described included strategies of detachment, engagement in activities and 'blotting out' symptoms. CONCLUSIONS:Patients' views about depressive symptoms are significantly different from conventional medical views. A 'disease management approach' fits uncomfortably with patients' experiences. Acknowledging feelings of loss of control and loss of self-identity in consultations may be useful. The wide employment of techniques patients use to control their disorders, such as support from others, engagement in activities and working at relationships, may be useful to encourage in consultations as alternatives to the use of antidepressant medication.
Authors: John Furler; Renata Kokanovic; Christopher Dowrick; Danielle Newton; Jane Gunn; Carl May Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Rebecca Dickinson; Peter Knapp; Allan O House; Vandana Dimri; Arnold Zermansky; Duncan Petty; John Holmes; David K Raynor Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Rachel Kornfield; Renwen Zhang; Jennifer Nicholas; Stephen M Schueller; Scott A Cambo; David C Mohr; Madhu Reddy Journal: Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst Date: 2020-04
Authors: Roos A van Grieken; Anneloes C E Kirkenier; Maarten W J Koeter; Udo W Nabitz; Aart H Schene Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 3.377