Literature DB >> 17630244

Rays as weapons.

H Vogel1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ionizing radiation is being regarded as life threatening. Therefore, accidents in nuclear power plants are considered equal threatening as nuclear bomb explosions, and attacks with dirty bombs are thought as dangerous as nuclear weapon explosions. However, there are differences between a nuclear bomb explosion, the largest imaginable accident in a nuclear power plant, and an attack with a dirty bomb. It is intended to point them out.
METHOD: The processes are described, which damage in a nuclear bomb explosion, in the largest imaginable accident in a nuclear power plant, and in an attack with a dirty bomb. Their effects are compared with each other, i.e. explosion, heat, shock wave (blast), ionizing radiation, and fallout.
RESULTS: In the center of the explosion of a nuclear bomb, the temperature rises to 100Mio degrees C, this induces damaging heat radiation and shock wave. In the largest imaginable accident in a nuclear power plant and in the conventional explosion of a dirty bomb, the temperature may rise up to 3000 degrees C, heat radiation and blast are limited to a short distance. In nuclear power plants, explosions due to oxyhydrogen gas or steam may occur. In nuclear explosions the dispersed radioactive material (fall out) consists mainly of isotopes with short half-life, in nuclear power plants and in dirty bomb attacks with longer half-life. The amount of fall out is comparable in nuclear bomb explosions with that in the largest imaginable accident in a nuclear power plant, it is smaller in attacks with dirty bombs. An explosion in a nuclear power plant even in the largest imaginable accident is not a nuclear explosion. In Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there were 200,000 victims nearly all by heat and blast, some 300 died by ionizing radiation. In Chernobyl, there have been less than 100 victims due to ionizing radiation up till now. A dirty bomb kills possibly with the explosion of conventional explosive, the dispersed radioactive material may damage individuals. The incorporation of irradiating substances may kill and be difficult to detect (Litvinenko). A new form of (government supported) terrorism/crime appears possible.
CONCLUSION: The differences are important between a nuclear weapon explosion, the largest imaginable accident in a nuclear power plant, and an attack with a dirty bomb. Nuclear weapons kill by heat and blast; in the largest imaginable accident in a nuclear power plant, they are less strong and limited to the plant; an attack with a dirty bomb is as life threatening as an ("ordinary") bomb attack, dispersed radiating material may be a risk for individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17630244     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  5 in total

1.  After the bomb drops: a new look at radiation-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).

Authors:  Jacqueline P Williams; William H McBride
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Total-Body Irradiation Exacerbates Dissemination of Cutaneous Candida Albicans Infection.

Authors:  Margaret L Barlow; Ryan J Cummings; Alice P Pentland; Tanzy M T Love; Constantine G Haidaris; Julie L Ryan; Edith M Lord; Scott A Gerber
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Dietary flaxseed administered post thoracic radiation treatment improves survival and mitigates radiation-induced pneumonopathy in mice.

Authors:  Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou; Sonia Tyagi; Kay-See Tan; Sarah Hagan; Ralph Pietrofesa; Floyd Dukes; Evguenia Arguiri; Daniel F Heitjan; Charalambos C Solomides; Keith A Cengel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Radiation mitigating properties of the lignan component in flaxseed.

Authors:  Ralph Pietrofesa; Jason Turowski; Sonia Tyagi; Floyd Dukes; Evguenia Arguiri; Theresa M Busch; Shannon M Gallagher-Colombo; Charalambos C Solomides; Keith A Cengel; Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  More Efficient Prussian Blue Nanoparticles for an Improved Caesium Decontamination from Aqueous Solutions and Biological Fluids.

Authors:  Fabio Carniato; Giorgio Gatti; Chiara Vittoni; Andrey M Katsev; Matteo Guidotti; Claudio Evangelisti; Chiara Bisio
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.