Literature DB >> 17630006

Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations.

Ken R Catchpole1, Anthony E B Giddings, Michael Wilkinson, Guy Hirst, Trevor Dale, Marc R de Leval.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of technical failure during operations is recognized, but there is evidence that further improvements in safety depend on systems factors, in particular, effective team skills. The hypotheses that small problems can escalate to more serious situations and that effective teamwork can prevent the development of serious situations, were examined to develop a method to assess these skills and to provide evidence for improvements in training and systems. METHOD(S): Observations were made during 24 pediatric cardiac and 18 orthopedic operations. Operations were classified by accepted indicators of risk and the observations used to generate indicators of performance. Negative events were recorded and organized into 3 levels of clinical importance (minor problems, those negative events that were seemingly innocuous; intraoperative performance, the proportion of key operating tasks that were disrupted; and major problems, events that compromised directly the safety of the patient or the quality of the treatment). The ability of the team to work together safely was classified using a validated scale adapted from research in aviation. Operative duration was also recorded. RESULT(S): Both escalation and teamwork hypotheses were supported. Multiple linear regression suggests that for every 3 minor problems above the 9.9 expected per operation (P <.001), intraoperative performance reduces by 1% (P = .005), and operative duration increases by 10 minutes (P = .032). Effective teams have fewer minor problems per operation (P = .035) and consequently higher intraoperative performance and shorter operating times. Operative risk affected intraoperative performance (P = .004) and duration (P <.001), with the type of operation affecting only duration (P <.001). Eight major problems were observed; these showed a strong association with risk, intraoperative performance, teamwork, and the number of minor problems. CONCLUSION(S): Structured observation of effective teamwork in the operating room can identify substantive deficiencies in the system, even in otherwise successful operations. Decreasing the number of minor problems can lead to a smoother, safer, and shorter operation. Effective teamwork can help decrease the number of small problems and prevent them from escalating to more serious situations. The most effective and sustainable route to improved safety is in capturing these minor problems and identifying related system improvements, combined with training in safe team working. This method is a validated and practical way to improve performance during otherwise successful operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17630006     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.01.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  41 in total

1.  Components of Critical Decision Making and ABSITE Assessment: Toward a More Comprehensive Evaluation.

Authors:  Satish Krishnamurthy; Usha Satish; Tina Foster; Siegfried Streufert; Mantosh Dewan; Thomas Krummel
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-12

2.  [Intraoperative consulting. An easy addition to the surgical safety checklist for perioperative quality assurance].

Authors:  W Teichmann; S Petersen; D Thieme; W Rost; W Schwenk
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Culture, communication and safety: lessons from the airline industry.

Authors:  Lori G d'Agincourt-Canning; Niranjan Kissoon; Mona Singal; Alexander F Pitfield
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Intraoperative consultation as an instrument of quality management.

Authors:  Wolfgang Teichmann; Wilm Rost; Daniel Thieme; Sven Petersen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Safety in the OR: who's in and who's out?

Authors:  Debra Sudan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Flow disruptions during trauma care.

Authors:  Daniel Shouhed; Renaldo Blocker; Alex Gangi; Eric Ley; Jennifer Blaha; Daniel Margulies; Douglas A Wiegmann; Ben Starnes; Cathy Karl; Richard Karl; Bruce L Gewertz; Ken R Catchpole
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Adverse Events in the Operating Room: Definitions, Prevalence, and Characteristics. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  James J Jung; Jonah Elfassy; Peter Jüni; Teodor Grantcharov
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Ergonomics perspective for identifying and reducing internal operative flow disruption for laparoscopic urological surgery.

Authors:  Latif Al-Hakim; Jiaquan Xiao; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The adaption and implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist for dental procedures.

Authors:  S Wright; T C Ucer; G Crofts
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  Barriers to efficiency in robotic surgery: the resident effect.

Authors:  Monica Jain; Brian T Fry; Luke W Hess; Jennifer T Anger; Bruce L Gewertz; Ken Catchpole
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.