Literature DB >> 17629749

The effect of forest type on throughfall deposition and seepage flux: a review.

An De Schrijver1, Guy Geudens, Laurent Augusto, Jeroen Staelens, Jan Mertens, Karen Wuyts, Leen Gielis, Kris Verheyen.   

Abstract

Converting deciduous forests to coniferous plantations and vice versa causes environmental changes, but till now insight into the overall effect is lacking. This review, based on 38 case studies, aims to find out how coniferous and deciduous forests differ in terms of throughfall (+stemflow) deposition and seepage flux to groundwater. From the comparison of coniferous and deciduous stands at comparable sites, it can be inferred that deciduous forests receive less N and S via throughfall (+stemflow) deposition on the forest floor. In regions with relatively low open field deposition of atmospheric N (<10 kg N ha(-1) year(-1)), lower NH(4)(+) mean throughfall (+stemflow) deposition was, however, reported under conifers compared to deciduous forest, while in regions with high atmospheric N pollution (>10 kg N ha(-1) year(-1)), the opposite could be concluded. The higher the open field deposition of NH(4)(+), the bigger the difference between the coniferous and deciduous throughfall (+stemflow) deposition. Furthermore, it can be concluded that canopy exchange of K(+), Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) is on average higher in deciduous stands. The significantly higher stand deposition flux of N and S in coniferous forests is reflected in a higher soil seepage flux of NO(3)(-), SO(4)(2-), K(+), Ca(2+), Mg(2+) and Al(III). Considering a subset of papers for which all necessary data were available, a close relationship between throughfall (+stemflow) deposition and seepage was found for N, irrespective of the forest type, while this was not the case for S. This review shows that the higher input flux of N and S in coniferous forests clearly involves a higher seepage of NO(3)(-) and SO(4)(2-) and accompanying cations K(+), Ca(2+), Mg(2+) and Al(III) into the groundwater, making this forest type more vulnerable to acidification and eutrophication compared to the deciduous forest type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17629749     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0776-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Deposition to forests in Europe: most important factors influencing dry deposition and models used for generalisation.

Authors:  Jan Willem Erisman; Geert Draaijers
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Long-term changes in water and soil chemistry in spruce and beech forests, solling, Germany.

Authors:  L G Wesselink; K J Meiwes; E Matzner; A Stein
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Nitrate leaching in agriculture to upper groundwater in the sandy regions of the Netherlands during the 1992-1995 period.

Authors:  Leo J M Boumans; Dico Fraters; Gerard Van Drecht
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  The Solling roof revisited--slow recovery from acidification observed and modeled despite a decade of "clean-rain" treatment.

Authors:  Liisa Martinson; Norbert Lamersdorf; Per Warfvinge
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 5.  The globalization of nitrogen deposition: consequences for terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  Pamela Matson; Kathleen A Lohse; Sharon J Hall
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  Nitrogen saturation of terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  G I Agren; E Bosatta
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Atmospheric input of elements to forest ecosystems: a method of estimation using artificial foliage placed above rain collectors.

Authors:  A Stachurski; J R Zimka
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Field intercomparison of throughfall measurements performed within the framework of the Pan European intensive monitoring program of EU/ICP Forest.

Authors:  Albert Bleeker; Geert Draaijers; Dennis van der Veen; Jan Willem Erisman; Han Möls; Peter Fonteijn; Marco Geusebroek
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Comparison of throughfall and soil solution chemistry between a high-density Corsican pine stand and a naturally regenerated silver birch stand.

Authors:  A De Schrijver; L Nachtergale; J Staelens; S Luyssaert; L De Keersmaeker
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.071

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Modelling understorey dynamics in temperate forests under global change-Challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  D Landuyt; M P Perring; R Seidl; F Taubert; H Verbeeck; K Verheyen
Journal:  Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Atmospheric inputs and nitrogen saturation status in and adjacent to Class I wilderness areas of the northeastern US.

Authors:  Pamela H Templer; Kathleen C Weathers; Amanda Lindsey; Katherine Lenoir; Lindsay Scott
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Assessing the influence of topography and canopy structure on Douglas fir throughfall with LiDAR and empirical data in the Santa Cruz mountains, USA.

Authors:  K T Griffith; A G Ponette-González; L M Curran; K C Weathers
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Greater accumulation of litter in spruce (Picea abies) compared to beech (Fagus sylvatica) stands is not a consequence of the inherent recalcitrance of needles.

Authors:  Torsten W Berger; Pétra Berger
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.192

5.  Quantitative study on nitrogen deposition and canopy retention in Mediterranean evergreen forests.

Authors:  Anna Avila; Laura Aguillaume; Sheila Izquieta-Rojano; Héctor García-Gómez; David Elustondo; Jesús Miguel Santamaría; Rocío Alonso
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  The variations of aluminium species in mountainous forest soils and its implications to soil acidification.

Authors:  Monika Bradová; Václav Tejnecký; Luboš Borůvka; Karel Němeček; Christopher Ash; Ondřej Šebek; Miroslav Svoboda; Jitka Zenáhlíková; Ondřej Drábek
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Climate mitigation and intensified forest management in Norway: To what extent are surface waters safeguarded?

Authors:  Frode Sundnes; Marianne Karlsson; Froukje Maria Platjouw; Nicholas Clarke; Øyvind Kaste; Salar Valinia
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Effects of Forest Type on Nutrient Fluxes in Throughfall, Stemflow, and Litter Leachate within Acid-Polluted Locations in Southwest China.

Authors:  Zhan Chen; Yihao Wang; Ruisi Chen; Xiuya Ni; Jixin Cao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.