Literature DB >> 17629607

Reconstruction of ultrasonic sound velocity and attenuation coefficient using linear arrays: clinical assessment.

Chen-Han Chang1, Sheng-Wen Huang, Hsin-Chia Yang, Yi-Hong Chou, Pai-Chi Li.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of using sound velocity and tissue attenuation to clinically discriminate breast cancer from healthy tissues. The methods for reconstructing the sound-velocity and attenuation-coefficient distributions were previously proposed and tested on tissue-mimicking phantoms. The methods require only raw channel data acquired by a linear transducer array and can therefore be implemented on existing clinical systems. In this paper, these methods are tested on clinical data. A total of 19 biopsy-proven cases, consisting of five carcinomas (CAs), seven fibroadenomas (FAs), six adipose tissue (fat) and one oil cyst, were evaluated. A single imaging setup consisting of a 5-MHz, 128-channel linear array was used to simultaneously obtain B-mode image data, time-of-flight data and attenuation data. The sound velocity and attenuation coefficient can be reconstructed inside and outside a region of interest manually selected in the B-mode image. To reduce distortion caused by tissue inhomogeneities, an optimal filter derived from pulse-echo data-with water replacing the breast tissue-is applied. We found that the sound velocities in CA, FA and fat tissues relative to those in the surrounding tissues were 49.8 +/- 35.2, 2.6 +/- 27.3 and -25.1 +/- 44.9 m/s (mean +/- SD), respectively, whereas the relative attenuation coefficients were 0.21 +/- 0.58, 0.27 +/- 0.62 and -0.02 +/- 0.59 dB/cm/MHz. These results indicate that CA can be discriminated from FA and fat by choosing an appropriate threshold for the relative sound velocity (i.e., 18.5 m/s). However, the large variations in the attenuation within the same type of tissue make simple thresholding ineffective. Nevertheless, the method described in this paper has the potential to reduce negative biopsies and to improve the accuracy of breast cancer detection in clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17629607     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  8 in total

1.  Non-linear inverse scattering: high resolution quantitative breast tissue tomography.

Authors:  J Wiskin; D T Borup; S A Johnson; M Berggren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.

Authors:  Kayvan Samimi; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 1.578

3.  An in vivo validation of the application of acoustic radiation force to enhance the diagnostic utility of molecular imaging using 3-d ultrasound.

Authors:  Ryan C Gessner; Jason E Streeter; Roshni Kothadia; Steven Feingold; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Performance evaluation of the spectral centroid downshift method for attenuation estimation.

Authors:  Kayvan Samimi; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Breast ultrasound tomography versus MRI for clinical display of anatomy and tumor rendering: preliminary results.

Authors:  Bryan Ranger; Peter J Littrup; Nebojsa Duric; Priti Chandiwala-Mody; Cuiping Li; Steven Schmidt; Jessica Lupinacci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Optimum Diffraction-Corrected Frequency-Shift Estimator of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient.

Authors:  Kayvan Samimi; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Monitoring Microwave Ablation of Ex Vivo Bovine Liver Using Ultrasonic Attenuation Imaging.

Authors:  Kayvan Samimi; James K White; Christopher L Brace; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography.

Authors:  Cuiping Li; Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lianjie Huang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.998

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.