Literature DB >> 17629423

Kinetics of fertilization and development, and sex ratio of bovine embryos produced using the semen of different bulls.

M Alomar1, H Tasiaux, S Remacle, F George, D Paul, I Donnay.   

Abstract

The between bulls variation in in vitro fertility and the shift of sex ratio towards male embryos are two problems affecting the in vitro production (IVP) of bovine embryos. Our objective was to evaluate the kinetics of fertilization, embryo development and the sex ratio of the resulting embryos using the frozen/thawed semen of four different bulls. In a first experiment, the kinetics of pronucleus (PN) formation was evaluated at 8, 12 and 18 h post-insemination (hpi). Based upon the pronuclei sizes and the distance between the two pronuclei, inseminated oocytes were classified in three PN stages. Differences between bulls were observed at each time point, but were more important at 12 hpi. At 8 and 12 hpi bull III showed a significantly faster PN evolution by comparison with the three other bulls (P<0.05), while at 18 hpi, the proportion of the three PN stages was similar to those of bulls I and IV, bull II being delayed. In a second experiment, the kinetics of in vitro embryo development was compared using time-lapse cinematography. The analysis of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage revealed significant differences in the mean time of first cleavage (range of 22.7-25.6h, P<0.05), while the lengths of the subsequent three cell cycles did not differ between bulls. The early mean time of first cleavage with bull III was associated with an early blastulation and a high blastocyst rate at Day 7, in opposition to what was observed with bull II showing a later timing of first cleavage (first cleavage 22.1 hpi versus 25.5 hpi; blastulation 140.4 hpi versus 152.5 hpi; D7 blastocyst rates: 31.3% versus 21.9%; P<0.05). In a third experiment, 65-76 Day 8 blastocysts per bull were sexed by PCR. Only blastocysts obtained with bull III showed a shift in sex ratio towards male embryos (76% male embryos; P<0.05). Such shift was already observed at the 2-cell and morula stages. In conclusion, the bull influences the kinetics of PN formation, of embryo development and the sex ratio of the embryos. Moreover, those parameters might be related.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17629423     DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci        ISSN: 0378-4320            Impact factor:   2.145


  6 in total

1.  Non-invasive nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of male and female embryo metabolites during in vitro embryo culture.

Authors:  Marcello Rubessa; Andrea Ambrosi; Dianelys Gonzalez-Pena; Kathryn M Polkoff; Matthew B Wheeler
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 4.290

2.  Non-Invasive Identification of Sex in Cultured Bovine Embryos by UHPLC-MS/MS Metabolomics.

Authors:  Isabel Gimeno; Pablo García-Manrique; Susana Carrocera; Cristina López-Hidalgo; Marta Muñoz; Luis Valledor; David Martín-González; Enrique Gómez
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.747

3.  Efficient in vitro adipocyte model of long-term lipolysis: a tool to study the behavior of lipophilic compounds.

Authors:  Caroline Louis; Carine Van den Daelen; Gilles Tinant; Sophie Bourez; Jean-Pierre Thomé; Isabelle Donnay; Yvan Larondelle; Cathy Debier
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.416

4.  Chronological Reorganization of Microtubules, Actin Microfilaments, and Chromatin during the First Cell Cycle in Swamp Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Embryos.

Authors:  Vibuntita Chankitisakul; Theerawat Tharasanit; Kriengsak Tasripoo; Mongkol Techakumphu
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2010-12-22

5.  A historical perspective of embryo-related technologies in South America.

Authors:  João Henrique Moreira Viana; Ana Cristina Silva Figueiredo; Romany Louise Ribeiro Gonçalves; Luiz Gustavo Bruno Siqueira
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Sperm traits on in vitro production (IVP) of bovine embryos: Too much of anything is good for nothing.

Authors:  Adriano Felipe Perez Siqueira; Letícia Signori de Castro; Patrícia Monken de Assis; Luana de Cássia Bicudo; Camilla Mota Mendes; Marcílio Nichi; José Antônio Visintin; Mayra Elena Ortiz D'Ávila Assumpção
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.