Literature DB >> 17628486

White-marker imaging--separating magnetic susceptibility effects from partial volume effects.

Jan-Henry Seppenwoolde1, Koen L Vincken, Chris J G Bakker.   

Abstract

By applying dephasing gradients, local magnetic field inhomogeneitiescan selectively visualized with positive contrast, such as those created by magnetically labeled cells. This is known as "white-marker imaging." In white-marker imaging, subvoxel signal variations are also visualized as a result of partial volume (PV) effects and may compromise the identification of magnetic structures (e.g., magnetically-labeled cells). This study presents the theory and proof-of-principle experiments of a strategy to eliminate PV effects during white-marker imaging. The strategy employs the asymmetry of the signal response curves for non-PV effects as a function of externally applied gradients. In the case of PV effects, subtraction of the symmetrical signal responses eliminates their contribution. In vitro experimental images were made using a spherical phantom with cylindrical elements. In vivo images of the brain were obtained at a location that included air cavities (susceptibility effects) and the circle of Willis (PV effect). The results show that PV effects were eliminated in the in vitro experiments and were virtually absent under in vivo conditions. Copyright (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17628486     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  7 in total

1.  Echo-dephased steady state free precession.

Authors:  Sunil Patil; Oliver Bieri; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Susceptibility gradient quantization by MRI signal response mapping (SIRMA) to dephaser.

Authors:  F Franconi; C Chapon; J J Le Jeune; P Richomme; L Lemaire
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Positive contrast with therapeutic iron nanoparticles at 4.7 T.

Authors:  Monica Sigovan; Misara Hamoudeh; Achraf Al Faraj; Delphine Charpigny; Hatem Fessi; Emmanuelle Canet-Soulas
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Quantification of iron-labeled cells with positive contrast in mouse brains.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Brisset; Monica Sigovan; Fabien Chauveau; Adrien Riou; Emilie Devillard; Virginie Desestret; Monique Touret; Serge Nataf; J Honnorat; Emmanuelle Canet-Soulas; Norbert Nighoghossian; Yves Berthezene; Marlene Wiart
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Direct in vitro comparison of six three-dimensional positive contrast methods for susceptibility marker imaging.

Authors:  Evert-jan P A Vonken; Michael Schär; Jing Yu; Chris J G Bakker; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  A novel (19)F agent for detection and quantification of human dendritic cells using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fernando Bonetto; Mangala Srinivas; Arend Heerschap; Robbie Mailliard; Eric T Ahrens; Carl G Figdor; I Jolanda M de Vries
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 7.316

7.  Dual echo positive contrast bSSFP for real-time visualization of passive devices during magnetic resonance guided cardiovascular catheterization.

Authors:  Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Toby Rogers; Hui Xue; Michael S Hansen; Robert J Lederman; Anthony Z Faranesh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.364

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.