UNLABELLED: Working memory (WM) has hardly been explored in non-psychotic relatives of schizophrenic patients despite its potential suitability as a neurocognitive endophenotype. Indeed, WM modalities, components and processes have rarely been compared in the same group of relatives. The present study examined neurocognitive performance in healthy siblings of schizophrenic patients, including both spatial and verbal WM modalities and tests tapping maintenance (Spatial Span Backwards and CPT-IP d') and manipulative (Letters and Numbers Sequencing) WM processes. METHODS: 68 schizophrenia patients, 38 healthy siblings and 63 controls were assessed on IQ, attention, memory, WM, and executive functions. Cluster A symptoms were screened out in siblings and controls. RESULTS: Siblings had an intermediate performance between that of schizophrenic patients and controls. They performed worse than controls on IQ, LNS, animal naming, backwards spatial span, phonemic fluency, numbers d', and forward spatial span. DISCUSSION: Consistent with the WM literature in schizophrenia, both verbal and spatial WM differed significantly between siblings and controls, suggesting that WM deficits are modality independent. Our results failed to support the hypothesis that tests tapping WM manipulative processes heavily loading on DLFPC are quantitatively more impaired in relatives and, therefore, more sensitive to liability for schizophrenia. However, firm conclusions cannot be drawn until more studies assessing both maintenance and manipulative WM processes in relatives are available.
UNLABELLED: Working memory (WM) has hardly been explored in non-psychotic relatives of schizophrenicpatients despite its potential suitability as a neurocognitive endophenotype. Indeed, WM modalities, components and processes have rarely been compared in the same group of relatives. The present study examined neurocognitive performance in healthy siblings of schizophrenicpatients, including both spatial and verbal WM modalities and tests tapping maintenance (Spatial Span Backwards and CPT-IP d') and manipulative (Letters and Numbers Sequencing) WM processes. METHODS: 68 schizophreniapatients, 38 healthy siblings and 63 controls were assessed on IQ, attention, memory, WM, and executive functions. Cluster A symptoms were screened out in siblings and controls. RESULTS: Siblings had an intermediate performance between that of schizophrenicpatients and controls. They performed worse than controls on IQ, LNS, animal naming, backwards spatial span, phonemic fluency, numbers d', and forward spatial span. DISCUSSION: Consistent with the WM literature in schizophrenia, both verbal and spatial WM differed significantly between siblings and controls, suggesting that WM deficits are modality independent. Our results failed to support the hypothesis that tests tapping WM manipulative processes heavily loading on DLFPC are quantitatively more impaired in relatives and, therefore, more sensitive to liability for schizophrenia. However, firm conclusions cannot be drawn until more studies assessing both maintenance and manipulative WM processes in relatives are available.
Authors: Frieder M Paulus; Johannes Bedenbender; Sören Krach; Martin Pyka; Axel Krug; Jens Sommer; Miriam Mette; Markus M Nöthen; Stephanie H Witt; Marcella Rietschel; Tilo Kircher; Andreas Jansen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Raquelle I Mesholam-Gately; Timothea Toulopoulou; Elisabetta C Del Re; Max Lam; Lynn E DeLisi; Gary Donohoe; James T R Walters; Larry J Seidman; Tracey L Petryshen Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Natasha Radhu; Luis Garcia Dominguez; Faranak Farzan; Margaret A Richter; Mawahib O Semeralul; Robert Chen; Paul B Fitzgerald; Zafiris J Daskalakis Journal: Brain Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jacob A Miller; Matthew A Scult; Emily Drabant Conley; Qiang Chen; Daniel R Weinberger; Ahmad R Hariri Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: S Kristian Hill; Margret S H Harris; Ellen S Herbener; Mani Pavuluri; John A Sweeney Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Valentin Markov; Axel Krug; Sören Krach; Andreas Jansen; Thomas Eggermann; Karl Zerres; Tony Stöcker; N Jon Shah; Markus M Nöthen; Jens Treutlein; Marcella Rietschel; Tilo Kircher Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Christina Shen; Florin C Popescu; Eric Hahn; Tam T M Ta; Michael Dettling; Andres H Neuhaus Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2013-08-10 Impact factor: 9.306