OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to identify the cues that ward nurses and doctors use to identify patient deterioration and, secondly, examine the assessment and communication of deterioration in patients on acute wards of a regional hospital. METHODS: Mixed methods case study design in a 220 bed regional hospital. Case studies originated from patients admitted unexpectedly to ICU from general wards (n=17). Data collection occurred within 72 h of the patient's admission to ICU. Interviews with 11 nurses and 14 doctors, and chart audit of 17 patient records for the 24 h prior to ICU were undertaken. RESULTS: The results demonstrate reliance on vital signs for nurses and doctors for initial identification of patient deterioration. Subsequent to this, nurses relied on assessment of the patient's physical capabilities whilst doctors undertook additional clinical investigations. Admission category and co-morbidities increased clinicians' identification of deterioration but the extent of assessment was dictated by 'usual practice' for the regional hospital, the ward or particular patient category. A lack of timely referral to more senior clinicians was identified. Chart audit found that 13 (76%) patients had clinical markers prior to ICU admission and 10 (56%) had these markers for >2h in the previous 24h. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights inadequate communication between clinicians and lack of process for ensuring timely management when patients deteriorate in a regional hospital. The use of casual or locum staff who are less familiar with the clinical culture of regional hospitals may influence the recognition of, and response to, deteriorating ward patients.
OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to identify the cues that ward nurses and doctors use to identify patient deterioration and, secondly, examine the assessment and communication of deterioration in patients on acute wards of a regional hospital. METHODS: Mixed methods case study design in a 220 bed regional hospital. Case studies originated from patients admitted unexpectedly to ICU from general wards (n=17). Data collection occurred within 72 h of the patient's admission to ICU. Interviews with 11 nurses and 14 doctors, and chart audit of 17 patient records for the 24 h prior to ICU were undertaken. RESULTS: The results demonstrate reliance on vital signs for nurses and doctors for initial identification of patient deterioration. Subsequent to this, nurses relied on assessment of the patient's physical capabilities whilst doctors undertook additional clinical investigations. Admission category and co-morbidities increased clinicians' identification of deterioration but the extent of assessment was dictated by 'usual practice' for the regional hospital, the ward or particular patient category. A lack of timely referral to more senior clinicians was identified. Chart audit found that 13 (76%) patients had clinical markers prior to ICU admission and 10 (56%) had these markers for >2h in the previous 24h. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights inadequate communication between clinicians and lack of process for ensuring timely management when patients deteriorate in a regional hospital. The use of casual or locum staff who are less familiar with the clinical culture of regional hospitals may influence the recognition of, and response to, deteriorating ward patients.
Authors: Gooske Douw; Lisette Schoonhoven; Tineke Holwerda; Getty Huisman-de Waal; Arthur R H van Zanten; Theo van Achterberg; Johannes G van der Hoeven Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Alejandra Recio-Saucedo; Antonello Maruotti; Peter Griffiths; Gary B Smith; Paul Meredith; Greta Westwood; Carole Fogg; Paul Schmidt Journal: Nurs Open Date: 2018-07-16