Literature DB >> 17627688

A new way of looking at Caesarean section births.

Fergus P McCarthy1, Lynne Rigg, Louisa Cady, Fiona Cullinane.   

Abstract

AIMS: To implement the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) at the Royal Women's Hospital (RWH), Melbourne, in order to determine the main contributors to the rising Caesarean section (CS) rate.
METHODS: The TGCS divides women into ten groups according to parity, past obstetric history, singleton or multiple pregnancy, fetal presentation, gestational age and mode of onset of labour/delivery. The TGCS was applied retrospectively to the population of women who had a registered birth at the RWH between January 2005 and 31 December 2005.
RESULTS: A total of 5833 women gave birth to 6011 babies during the study period. A total of 1651 women (28.3%) had a CS birth. The total CS rates ranged from 3.7% (group 3) to 100% (group 9). Women in groups 1 and 2 were the greatest contributors to the emergency CS rate, 4.2% and 4.9%, respectively. Women in group 5 were the single greatest contributor to both the elective CS rate and the total CS rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The TGCS was successfully implemented at the RWH in 2005. The TGCS is ongoing, enabling monitoring of CS rates. The Robson TGCS demonstrates the need to focus on the care of women in groups 1, 2 and 5 in particular, if CS rates are to be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17627688     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00753.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  12 in total

1.  Using a Caesarean Section Classification System based on characteristics of the population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice.

Authors:  Maria L Costa; Jose G Cecatti; João P Souza; Helaine M Milanez; Metin A Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson's ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables.

Authors:  Paola Colais; Maria P Fantini; Danilo Fusco; Elisa Carretta; Elisa Stivanello; Jacopo Lenzi; Giulia Pieri; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Efty P Stavrou; Jane B Ford; Antonia W Shand; Jonathan M Morris; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Caesarean section among referred and self-referred birthing women: a cohort study from a tertiary hospital, northeastern Tanzania.

Authors:  Ingvil K Sørbye; Siri Vangen; Olola Oneko; Johanne Sundby; Per Bergsjø
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Interinstitutional variation of caesarean delivery rates according to indications in selected obstetric populations: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Maso; Monica Piccoli; Marcella Montico; Lorenzo Monasta; Luca Ronfani; Sara Parolin; Carmine Gigli; Daniele Domini; Claudio Fiscella; Sara Casarsa; Carlo Zompicchiatti; Michela De Agostini; Attilio D'Atri; Raffaela Mugittu; Santo La Valle; Cristina Di Leonardo; Valter Adamo; Mara Fracas; Giovanni Del Frate; Monica Olivuzzi; Silvio Giove; Maria Parente; Daniele Bassini; Simona Melazzini; Secondo Guaschino; Caterina Businelli; Franco G Toffoletti; Diego Marchesoni; Alberto Rossi; Sergio Demarini; Laura Travan; Giorgio Simon; Sandro Zicari; Giorgio Tamburlini; Salvatore Alberico
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean delivery in first pregnancy?

Authors:  Ali Gholami; Shaker Salarilak
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-04

7.  WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections.

Authors:  Ana P Betrán; A Metin Gulmezoglu; Michael Robson; Mario Merialdi; João P Souza; Daniel Wojdyla; Mariana Widmer; Guillermo Carroli; Maria R Torloni; Ana Langer; Alberto Narváez; Alejandro Velasco; Anibal Faúndes; Arnaldo Acosta; Eliette Valladares; Mariana Romero; Nelly Zavaleta; Sofia Reynoso; Vicente Bataglia
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Public and private pregnancy care in Reggio Emilia Province: an observational study on appropriateness of care and delivery outcomes.

Authors:  Laura Bonvicini; Silvia Candela; Andrea Evangelista; Daniela Bertani; Morena Casoli; Annarella Lusvardi; Antonella Messori; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Nadia Vindevoghel; Joao Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fetal outcome in emergency versus elective cesarean sections at Souissi Maternity Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.

Authors:  Soukayna Benzouina; Mohamed El-Mahdi Boubkraoui; Mustapha Mrabet; Naima Chahid; Aicha Kharbach; Amine El-Hassani; Amina Barkat
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.