Literature DB >> 17626259

Cranial endocasts from a growth series of Monodelphis domestica (Didelphidae, Marsupialia): A study of individual and ontogenetic variation.

Thomas E Macrini1, Timothy Rowe, John L Vandeberg.   

Abstract

Intraspecific variation (e.g., ontogenetic, individual, sexual dimorphic) is rarely examined among cranial endocasts (infillings of the braincase cavity) because of the difficulty in obtaining multiple specimens of a species, particularly fossil taxa. We extracted digital cranial endocasts from CT scans of a growth series of skulls of Monodelphis domestica, the gray short-tailed opossum, as a preliminary assessment of the amount of intraspecific variation in mammalian endocranial morphology. The goals of this study were 1) to provide an anatomical description to document developmental changes in endocranial morphology of M. domestica and 2) to examine ontogenetic and individual variation with respect to phylogenetic characters of endocranial cavities that are known to be variable between different mammalian taxa. In this study, "ontogenetic variation" refers to variation between specimens of different ages whereas "individual variation" (i.e., polymorphism) is restricted to variation between specimens of comparable age. Aside from size, changes in shape account for the greatest amount of morphological variation between the endocasts of different ages. Endocast length, width, and volume increase with age for the growth series. Relative olfactory bulb cast size increases with age in the growth series, but the relative size of the parafloccular casts shows a slight negative allometric trend through ontogeny. More than one-third of the phylogenetic characters of the endocranial cavity we examined showed some sort of variation (ontogenetic, individual, or both). This suggests that although endocasts are potentially informative for systematics, both ontogenetic and individual variation affect how endocranial characters are scored for phylogenetic analysis. Further studies such as this are necessary to determine the taxonomic extent of significant intraspecific variation of these endocranial characters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17626259     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  7 in total

1.  The internal cranial morphology of an armoured dinosaur Euoplocephalus corroborated by X-ray computed tomographic reconstruction.

Authors:  Tetsuto Miyashita; Victoria M Arbour; Lawrence M Witmer; Philip J Currie
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Best practices for digitally constructing endocranial casts: examples from birds and their dinosaurian relatives.

Authors:  Amy M Balanoff; G S Bever; Matthew W Colbert; Julia A Clarke; Daniel J Field; Paul M Gignac; Daniel T Ksepka; Ryan C Ridgely; N Adam Smith; Christopher R Torres; Stig Walsh; Lawrence M Witmer
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Comparative morphology of snake (Squamata) endocasts: evidence of phylogenetic and ecological signals.

Authors:  Rémi Allemand; Renaud Boistel; Gheylen Daghfous; Zoé Blanchet; Raphaël Cornette; Nathalie Bardet; Peggy Vincent; Alexandra Houssaye
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Occipital condyle width (OCW) is a highly accurate predictor of body mass in therian mammals.

Authors:  Russell K Engelman
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 7.431

5.  Anthropogenic environments exert variable selection on cranial capacity in mammals.

Authors:  Emilie C Snell-Rood; Naomi Wick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Ontogenetic Shape Change in the Chicken Brain: Implications for Paleontology.

Authors:  Soichiro Kawabe; Seiji Matsuda; Naoki Tsunekawa; Hideki Endo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evolutionary ecology of intraspecific brain size variation: a review.

Authors:  Abigél Gonda; Gábor Herczeg; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.