Literature DB >> 17625616

Effects of attachment design on strains around implants supporting overdentures.

Cihat Cekiç1, Kivanç Akça, Murat C Cehreli.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare strain magnitudes around implants supporting ball-retained, bar-retained, and distal cantilevered bar-retained mandibular overdentures subjected to vertical and oblique loads. Twelve edentulous mandibular acrylic resin casts with 2 implants in the parasymphyseal region were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 4). Ball-retained, bar-retained, and distal cantilevered (8 mm) bar-retained overdentures were fabricated. A linear strain gauge was bonded distal to each supporting implant on the surface of the cast. As static loads of 20, 40, and 60 N vertically were applied 20 degrees obliquely and unilaterally to the overdenture, the generation of strains was recorded by a data acquisition system and corresponding software at a sample rate of 1,000 Hz. The absolute strain data of each group were compared within each loading condition by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post hoc tests (a = .05). Under vertical and oblique loading conditions, strain magnitudes around implants supporting ball-retained overdentures were higher than those induced around bar-retained and distal cantilevered bar-retained overdentures (P <.01). On the contralateral side from load application, strains around implants supporting ball-retained overdentures were lower than those around bar-retained and distal cantilevered bar-retained overdentures (P <.01). Force distribution does not occur for implants supporting ball-retained overdentures, and such implants are subjected to more load than those supporting bar-retained and distal cantilevered bar-retained overdentures.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17625616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  4 in total

1.  Stress-strain distribution at bone-implant interface of two splinted overdenture systems using 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Mostafa Omran Hussein
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  [Clinical application of mandibular overdenture supported by a two-implant and interforaminal bar in an edentulous atrophic mandible].

Authors:  Dao Li; Xiao Xue; Wang Xiaodong; Zhao Ke
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-08-01

3.  Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study.

Authors:  Soumyadev Satpathy; C L Satish Babu; Shilpa Shetty; Bharat Raj
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

4.  Evaluation of stress distribution of implant-retained mandibular overdenture with different vertical restorative spaces: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Mahmoud Farzin; Saeid Talebi; Niloufar Khodaeian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.