Literature DB >> 17624965

Exploring the role of vision in social foraging: what happens to group size, vigilance, spacing, aggression and habitat use in birds and mammals that forage at night?

Guy Beauchamp1.   

Abstract

I examined the role of vision in social foraging by contrasting group size, vigilance, spacing, aggression and habitat use between day and night in many species of birds and mammals. The literature review revealed that the rate of predation/disturbance was often reduced at night while food was considered more available. Social foraging at night was prevalent in many species suggesting that low light levels at night are not sufficient to prevent the formation and cohesion of animal groups. Group sizes were similar or larger at night than during the day in more than half the bird populations and in the majority of mammal populations. Factors such as calls, feeding noises or smells may contribute to the formation and cohesion of groups at night. Larger numbers of foragers at night may also facilitate the aggregation of more foragers. Vigilance levels were usually lower at night perhaps as a response to the lower predation risk or to the decreased value of scanning for predators that are difficult to locate. Low light levels may also make visual cues that promote aggression less conspicuous, which may be a factor in the lower levels of aggression documented at night. Spacing varied as a function of time of day in response to changes in foraging mode or food availability. Habitats that are avoided during the day were often used at night. Foraging at night presents birds and mammals with a new set of constraints that influence group size, time budgeting and habitat use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17624965     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00021.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  7 in total

1.  Experimental evidence for group hunting via eavesdropping in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Dina K N Dechmann; Silke L Heucke; Luca Giuggioli; Kamran Safi; Christian C Voigt; Martin Wikelski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Comparison of solitary and collective foraging strategies of Caenorhabditis elegans in patchy food distributions.

Authors:  Siyu Serena Ding; Leah S Muhle; André E X Brown; Linus J Schumacher; Robert G Endres
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Avoiding incidental predation by mammalian herbivores: accurate detection and efficient response in aphids.

Authors:  Moshe Gish; Amots Dafni; Moshe Inbar
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-07-08

4.  Group association and vocal behaviour during foraging trips in Gentoo penguins.

Authors:  Noori Choi; Jeong-Hoon Kim; Nobuo Kokubun; Seongseop Park; Hosung Chung; Won Young Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses.

Authors:  Pierrick Blanchard; Christine Lauzeral; Simon Chamaillé-Jammes; Clément Brunet; Arnaud Lec'hvien; Guillaume Péron; Dominique Pontier
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.964

6.  Artificial light pollution increases nocturnal vigilance in peahens.

Authors:  Jessica L Yorzinski; Sarah Chisholm; Sydney D Byerley; Jeanee R Coy; Aisyah Aziz; Jamie A Wolf; Amanda C Gnerlich
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Heavy rainfall triggers increased nocturnal flight in desert populations of the Pacific black duck (Anas superciliosa).

Authors:  J F McEvoy; R F H Ribot; J C Wingfield; A T D Bennett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.