Literature DB >> 17624578

Altered esophageal motility and gastroesophageal barrier in patients with jejunal interposition after distal esophageal resection for early stage adenocarcinoma.

Georg R Linke1, Jan Borovicka, Radu Tutuian, Rene Warschkow, Andreas Zerz, Jochen Lange, Michael Zünd.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Limited resection of the esophagogastric junction has been proven to be safe and oncologically radical in patients with early esophageal cancer. Reconstruction with interposition of isoperistaltic jejunal loop (Merendino procedure) is supposed to prevent gastroesophageal reflux and therefore the recurrence of intestinal metaplasia at the anastomosis. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of acid and nonacid refluxes after Merendino procedure using multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2005, 12 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma underwent limited resection and jejunal interposition. Ten patients agreed to undergo a Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale assessment, upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and combined 24-h MII-pH monitoring more than 10 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Postoperatively, 4 (40%) patients reported belching without heartburn or acid regurgitation, 3 of them having a positive symptom index during 24-h MII-pH monitoring. Upper GI endoscopy revealed no inflammation, metaplasia, or stenosis at the esophagojejunal anastomosis. Esophageal manometry showed ineffective esophageal motility in four of ten patients. Combined 24-h MII-pH monitoring revealed normal distal esophageal acid exposure (% time pH < 4: 0.1% [0-1.5]), normal number of acid reflux episodes (3 [0-11]) but a high number of nonacid reflux episodes (82 [33-184]). Overall, eight patients revealed an abnormal number of nonacid reflux episodes.
CONCLUSION: The limited resection with jejunal interposition for early esophageal cancer is efficient in controlling acid but not nonacid reflux. While the clinical relevance of nonacid reflux in the recurrence of Barrett's esophagus is currently unknown, endoscopic surveillance should be considered in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17624578     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0213-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  18 in total

Review 1.  Reflux after oesophagectomy.

Authors:  A Aly; G G Jamieson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Scintigraphic evaluation of jejunal interposition after distal esophageal resection for early Barrett's carcinoma.

Authors:  Albrecht W Stier; Marcus Feith; Christiane Weigel; Marcus Schwaiger; Claus D Heidecke; Hubert J Stein
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Multichannel intraluminal impedance: general principles and technical issues.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2005-04

4.  Metaplastic columnar mucosa in the cervical esophagus after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Stefan Oberg; Jan Johansson; Jörgen Wenner; Bruno Walther
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  D A Revicki; M Wood; I Wiklund; J Crawley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The jejunal interposition operation: a follow-up on seventeen patients followed 10 to 17 years.

Authors:  P Moylan JP; J W Bell; J R Cantrell; K A Merendino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  H J Stein; M Feith; J Mueller; M Werner; J R Siewert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Short-segment intestinal interposition of the distal esophagus.

Authors:  H A Gaissert; D J Mathisen; H C Grillo; R A Malt; J C Wain; A C Moncure; J H Kim; P R Mueller; R DeAngelis; L W Ottinger
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Jejunal interposition for benign esophageal disease. Technical considerations and long-term results.

Authors:  C Wright; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Recurrent Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Herbert C Wolfsen; Lois L Hemminger; Kenneth R DeVault
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes for jejunal interposition reconstruction compared with Roux-en-Y anastomosis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Xi Fan; Zhong-Fa Xu; Mei-Rong Wang; Dao-Tang Li; Xiang-Shan Yang; Jing Guo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Laparoscopy-assisted resection of proximal gastric cancer: is less than all more or less complete, or is all more, nonetheless?

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; Changhua Zhang; John C Mansour
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  How radical should surgery be for early esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Dean Bogoevski; Maximilian Bockhorn; Alexandra Koenig; Matthias Reeh; Katharina von Loga; Guido Sauter; Thomas Rösch; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Evaluation of resection of the gastroesophageal junction and jejunal interposition (Merendino procedure) as a rescue procedure in patients with a failed redo antireflux procedure. A single-center experience.

Authors:  Apostolos Analatos; Mats Lindblad; Ioannis Rouvelas; Peter Elbe; Lars Lundell; Magnus Nilsson; Andrianos Tsekrekos; Jon A Tsai
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.