Literature DB >> 17623836

Phase 1 study of lonafarnib (SCH 66336) and imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who have failed prior single-agent therapy with imatinib.

Jorge Cortes1, Elias Jabbour, George Q Daley, Susan O'Brien, Srdan Verstovsek, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Charles Koller, Yali Zhu, Paul Statkevich, Hagop Kantarjian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lonafarnib is an orally bioavailable nonpetidomimetic farnesyl transferase inhibitor with significant activity against BCR-ABL-positive cell lines and primary human chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells. Lonafarnib can inhibit the proliferation of imatinib-resistant cells and increases imatinib-induced apoptosis in vitro in cells from imatinib-resistant patients.
METHODS: The authors conducted a phase 1 study of lonafarnib in combination with imatinib in patients with CML who failed imatinib therapy. The starting dose level for patients with chronic phase (CP) disease was imatinib, 400 mg/day, plus lonafarnib at a dose of 100 mg twice daily. The starting dose levels for accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP) disease were 600 mg/day and 100 mg twice daily, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were treated (9 with CP, 11 with AP, and 3 with BP) for a median of 25 weeks (range, 4-102 weeks). Of those with CP disease, 2 patients had grade 3 (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at the 400 + 125-mg dose, including diarrhea (2 patients), vomiting (1 patient), and fatigue (1 patient). In patients with AP/BP disease, DLTs were observed at the 600 + 125-mg dose and was comprised of diarrhea (1 patient) and hypokalemia (1 patient). Eight patients (35%) responded; 3 with CP disease achieved a complete hematologic response (CHR) (2 patients) and a complete cytogenetic response (1 patient). Three patients with AP disease responded (2 CHR, 1 partial cytogenetic response), and 2 patients with BP disease demonstrated hematologic improvement. Pharmacokinetics data suggest no apparent increase in exposure or changes in the pharmacokinetics of either lonafarnib or imatinib when they are coadministered.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study indicate that the combination of lonafarnib and imatinib is well tolerated and the maximum tolerated dose of lonafarnib is 100 mg twice daily when combined with imatinib at a dose of either 400 mg or 600 mg daily. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17623836     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biology, pathology, and therapeutic targeting of RAS.

Authors:  J Matthew Rhett; Imran Khan; John P O'Bryan
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 6.242

2.  A phase I trial of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor, SCH 66336, with temozolomide for patients with malignant glioma.

Authors:  Annick Desjardins; David A Reardon; Katherine B Peters; Stevie Threatt; April D Coan; James E Herndon; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman; James J Vredenburgh
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Blast and accelerated phase CML: room for improvement.

Authors:  Joan How; Vinayak Venkataraman; Gabriela Soriano Hobbs
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 4.  Targeting mutant KRAS for anticancer therapeutics: a review of novel small molecule modulators.

Authors:  Yuanxiang Wang; Christine E Kaiser; Brendan Frett; Hong-Yu Li
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Electrolyte disturbances and acute kidney injury induced by imatinib therapy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Azevedo de Oliveira; Igor Denizarde Bacelar Marques; Antonio Carlos Seguro; Lúcia Andrade
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-12-04

Review 6.  Third-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Jorge Cortes; Fabian Lang
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 7.  Potential Approaches Versus Approved or Developing Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Therapy.

Authors:  Emanuela Andretta; Caterina Costa; Consiglia Longobardi; Sara Damiano; Antonio Giordano; Francesco Pagnini; Serena Montagnaro; Massimiliano Quintiliani; Chiara Lauritano; Roberto Ciarcia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells: targeting therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Hanieh Mojtahedi; Niloufar Yazdanpanah; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 9.  Suboptimal response to or failure of imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: what is the optimal strategy?

Authors:  Elias Jabbour; Jorge E Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 10.  Non ABL-directed inhibitors as alternative treatment strategies for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Michele Massimino; Stefania Stella; Elena Tirrò; Chiara Romano; Maria Stella Pennisi; Adriana Puma; Livia Manzella; Antonino Zanghì; Fabio Stagno; Francesco Di Raimondo; Paolo Vigneri
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 27.401

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.