Literature DB >> 17623693

Vancomycin MIC creep in non-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin-susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001-05.

Gregory Steinkraus1, Roger White, Lawrence Friedrich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) vancomycin MIC shifts (MIC creep) at a tertiary care institution occurred that may have gone undetected using traditional susceptibility markers (percentage susceptible, MIC(50), MIC(90)) over a 5 year period. Additionally, MIC trends were evaluated for oxacillin, linezolid and daptomycin.
METHODS: Etest MICs were performed on MRSA blood culture isolates (January 2001-December 2005). Only one isolate per patient was studied. The reported Etest MIC result was used and not rounded upward. MIC(50), MIC(90), median and geometric mean MIC, percentage susceptible and percentage resistant were calculated for each drug in each year. Non-parametric methods (linear correlation and Mantel-Haenszel chi(2)) were used to assess MIC trends over time and the association of vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin MICs with oxacillin MICs.
RESULTS: All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin and resistant to oxacillin. MICs increased for vancomycin, linezolid and oxacillin (P < 0.0001); however, daptomycin MICs decreased slightly (P = 0.0386). For vancomycin, linezolid and oxacillin, there were significant increases (P < 0.0001) in the percentage of isolates with MICs that were higher than the respective 2001 median MIC, but not for daptomycin (P = 0.1361). Oxacillin MICs were associated with MICs of linezolid (r = 0.364, P < 0.0001), vancomycin (r = 0.353, P < 0.0001) and daptomycin (r = 0.106, P = 0.0063).
CONCLUSIONS: Oxacillin, vancomycin and linezolid MICs increased over time. For vancomycin and linezolid, these MIC increases were not reliably detected by percentage susceptibility as they occurred below the susceptibility breakpoint. Although the MICs of all agents appeared to be associated with increasing oxacillin MICs, the strongest associations were noted for vancomycin and linezolid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17623693     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  129 in total

1.  An association between bacterial genotype combined with a high-vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and risk of endocarditis in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Clare E Miller; Rahul Batra; Ben S Cooper; Amita K Patel; John Klein; Jonathan A Otter; Theodore Kypraios; Gary L French; Olga Tosas; Jonathan D Edgeworth
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Is vancomycin MIC "creep" method dependent? Analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility trends in blood isolates from North East Scotland from 2006 to 2010.

Authors:  B Edwards; K Milne; T Lawes; I Cook; A Robb; I M Gould
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of daptomycin, tigecycline, and linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infections in four western European countries.

Authors:  A Canut; A Isla; C Betriu; A R Gascón
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  In vitro pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and cefazolin alone and in combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Mao Hagihara; Dora E Wiskirchen; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Inhibitory activities of 11 antimicrobial agents and bactericidal activities of vancomycin and daptomycin against invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from 1999 through 2006.

Authors:  Robert L Holmes; James H Jorgensen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Synergistic effects of vancomycin and β-lactams against vancomycin highly resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Fumiaki Tabuchi; Yasuhiko Matsumoto; Masaki Ishii; Keita Tatsuno; Mitsuhiro Okazaki; Tomoaki Sato; Kyoji Moriya; Kazuhisa Sekimizu
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Comparison of detection methods for heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, with the population analysis profile method as the reference method.

Authors:  Sarah W Satola; Monica M Farley; Karen F Anderson; Jean B Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Is vancomycin ototoxicity a significant risk?

Authors:  Ryan K Shields; Jay L Martello; Brian A Potoski
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Children.

Authors:  Rana F Hamdy; Alice J Hsu; Chris Stockmann; Jared A Olson; Matthew Bryan; Adam L Hersh; Pranita D Tamma; Jeffrey S Gerber
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Use of vancomycin pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic properties in the treatment of MRSA infections.

Authors:  Christopher Giuliano; Christopher Giulano; Krystal K Haase; Ronald Hall
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.