Literature DB >> 17622562

Density dependence in the terrestrial life history stage of two anurans.

Elizabeth B Harper1, Raymond D Semlitsch.   

Abstract

Populations of species with complex life cycles have the potential to be regulated at multiple life history stages. However, research tends to focus on single stage density-dependence, which can lead to inaccurate conclusions about population regulation and subsequently hinder conservation efforts. In amphibians, many studies have demonstrated strong effects of larval density and have often assumed that populations are regulated at this life history stage. However, studies examining density regulation in the terrestrial stages are rare, and the functional relationships between terrestrial density and vital rates in amphibians are unknown. We determined the effects of population density on survival, growth and reproductive development in the terrestrial stage of two amphibians by raising juvenile wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) and American toads (Bufo americanus) at six densities in terrestrial enclosures. Density had strong negative effects on survival, growth and reproductive development in both species. We fitted a priori recruitment functions to describe the relationship between initial density and the density of survivors after one year, and determined the functional relationship between initial density and mass after one year. Animals raised at the lowest densities experienced growth and survival rates that were over twice as great as those raised at the highest density. All female wood frogs in the lowest density treatment showed signs of reproductive development, compared to only 6% in the highest density treatment. Female American toads reached minimum reproductive size only at low densities, and male wood frogs and American toads reached maturity only in the three lowest density treatments. Our results demonstrate that in the complex life cycle of amphibians, density in the terrestrial stage can reduce growth, survival and reproductive development and may play an important role in amphibian population regulation. We discuss the implications of these results for population regulation in complex life cycles and for amphibian conservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17622562     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0796-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Elasticity analysis as an important tool in evolutionary and population ecology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Habitat size, recruitment, and longevity as factors limiting population size in stage-structured species.

Authors:  Benjamin S Halpern; Steven D Gaines; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide.

Authors:  Simon N Stuart; Janice S Chanson; Neil A Cox; Bruce E Young; Ana S L Rodrigues; Debra L Fischman; Robert W Waller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Patterns of variance in stage-structured populations: evolutionary predictions and ecological implications.

Authors:  C A Pfister
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Complex life cycles and density dependence: assessing the contribution of egg mortality to amphibian declines.

Authors:  James R Vonesh; Omar De la Cruz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of density and predation on Scaphiopus couchi tadpoles in desert ponds.

Authors:  R A Newman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The genetic basis of altitudinal variation in the wood frog Rana sylvatica II. An experimental analysis of larval development.

Authors:  Keith A Berven
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Models of growth with density regulation in more than one life stage.

Authors:  D J Rodriguez
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Multistage density dependence in an amphibian.

Authors:  Res Altwegg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Reciprocal subsidies in ponds: does leaf input increase frog biomass export?

Authors:  Julia E Earl; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Consequences of intraspecific niche variation: phenotypic similarity increases competition among recently metamorphosed frogs.

Authors:  Michael F Benard; Jessica Middlemis Maher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Non-additive response of larval ringed salamanders to intraspecific density.

Authors:  Brittany H Ousterhout; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Complex hydroperiod induced carryover responses for survival, growth, and endurance of a pond-breeding amphibian.

Authors:  Cassandra M Thompson; Viorel D Popescu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Variable temperature regimes and wetland salinity reduce performance of juvenile wood frogs.

Authors:  Nicole C Dahrouge; Tracy A G Rittenhouse
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  Density-dependent effects on hatching success of the olive ridley turtle, Lepidochelys olivacea.

Authors:  Shaya Honarvar; Michael P O'Connor; James R Spotila
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Climatic influences on the breeding biology of the agile frog (Rana dalmatina).

Authors:  Magali Combes; David Pinaud; Christophe Barbraud; Jacques Trotignon; François Brischoux
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-12-19

8.  Snow cover and late fall movement influence wood frog survival during an unusually cold winter.

Authors:  Jason H O'Connor; Tracy A G Rittenhouse
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Effects of terrestrial buffer zones on amphibians on golf courses.

Authors:  Holly J Puglis; Michelle D Boone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Guidance for Developing Amphibian Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Jill Awkerman; Sandy Raimondo; Amelie Schmolke; Nika Galic; Pamela Rueda-Cediel; Katherine Kapo; Chiara Accolla; Maxime Vaugeois; Valery Forbes
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.