Literature DB >> 17622006

Impact of implant surface and grafting protocol on clinical outcomes of endosseous implants.

Claudio Marchetti1, Francesco Pieri, Stefano Trasarti, Giuseppe Corinaldesi, Marco Degidi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the survival of implants placed in maxillary sinuses augmented with a 70:30 mixture of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine hydroxyapatite (Bio-Oss) at 1 and 5 years, (2) observe the difference in survival rate between 1-stage and 2-stage procedures, and (3) compare the survival rate of rough-surfaced implants with that of machined implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 consecutively patients (48 sinuses) with Cawood and Howell Class V and VI atrophy were evaluated. Lateral osteotomy techniques were used in all cases. Implants were placed either simultaneous with grafting (1-stage procedure) or after a delay (2-stage procedure), depending on the amount of residual bone. A 70:30 mixture of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine hydroxyapatite was used as the graft material. All patients were followed up at 1 year after prosthetic loading, while a limited group of these patients was followed up to 5 years.
RESULTS: In 8 patients where the residual crestal bone under the sinus floor assessed by computed tomography was at least 4.5 mm (mean, 5.3 mm), the 1-stage procedure was used for 11 sinus elevations and 32 implants. In 22 patients where the residual crestal bone was less than 4.5 mm (mean, 2.5 mm), the 2-stage procedure was used for 37 sinus elevations and 108 implants. For the 140 implants placed, the overall survival rate was 95.7% at the healing abutment surgery, and the cumulative survival rate was 94.9% at 1 and 5 years. The type of surgical technique was significantly associated with implant failure (P < .05); implants placed using the 1-stage procedure showed a failure rate of 12.5%, while implants placed with the 2-stage procedure had a failure rate of 2.8%. No significant difference in survival rate was observed with respect to implant surface.
CONCLUSIONS: A high survival rate was achieved when sinus elevation was performed with a combination of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine hydroxyapatite, even where a minimal amount of residual crestal bone was present. The survival rate was improved when implants were placed after a healing period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17622006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  3 in total

1.  Performance of coralline hydroxyapatite in sinus floor augmentation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhi-Bin Luo; Qing-Bin Zhang; Zhao-Qiang Zhang; Dan Chen; Wang-Xiang Yan; Ke-Feng Li; Yu Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Alveolar ridge augmentation using chin bone graft, bovine bone mineral, and titanium mesh: Clinical, histological, and histomorphomtric study.

Authors:  Jihad Khamees; Mohammad Atef Darwiche; Nabil Kochaji
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  Membrane perforation rate in lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation using conventional rotating instruments and piezoelectric device-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Corinne Jordi; Khaled Mukaddam; Jörg Thomas Lambrecht; Sebastian Kühl
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-01-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.