Literature DB >> 1762008

Subtrochanteric femur fractures: a comparison of the Zickel nail, 95 degrees blade plate, and interlocking nail.

W W Brien1, D A Wiss, V Becker, T Lehman.   

Abstract

Seventy-nine nonconsecutive patients with subtrochanteric femur fractures were divided into three groups based on the method of fracture fixation. Group I consisted of 21 patients treated with a Zickel nail, Group II comprised 25 patients treated with a 95 degrees blade plate, and Group III included 33 patients treated with an interlocking nail. All patients in Group I and Group II had open reduction and internal fixation of their fractures. Ninety-four percent of the patients in Group III were treated by closed intramedullary nailing. The average operating times for Groups I, II, and III were 212, 272, and 181 min, respectively, while blood loss averaged 900, 1,500, and 600 ml for each group, respectively. Group I had one infection, ten malunions, and one nonunion. Group II had one infection, six malunions, and two nonunions. Group III had no infections, two malunions, and one nonunion. We conclude that closed interlocking nailing is the treatment of choice for acute nonpathologic subtrochanteric femur fractures in adults. There is decreased blood loss, reduced operating time, and fewer complications than with either the Zickel nail or the 95 degrees blade plate regardless of the fracture pattern or the degree of fracture comminution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1762008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  8 in total

1.  [Corrective osteotomy of post-traumatic malunions and pseudarthroses in the femur using a fork plate: a prospective analysis of 23 consecutive cases].

Authors:  M Clauss; T Ilchmann; P Zimmermann; P E Ochsner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Haomin Li; Haobo Jia; Xinlong Ma
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.511

3.  A study of 44 patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated using long nail and cerclage cables.

Authors:  P Persiani; G Noia; C de Cristo; J Graci; M D Gurzì; C Villani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-10-29

4.  Four pins assisted reduction of complex segmental femoral fractures: a technique for closed reduction.

Authors:  Zhan-le Zheng; Xian Yu; Guo-Qiang Xu; Wei Chen; Ying-Ze Zhang; Zhen-Qing Jiao
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-06

5.  Locked nailing for shortened subtrochanteric nonunions: a one-stage treatment.

Authors:  Chi-Chuan Wu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures using Selfdynamisable internal fixator.

Authors:  Ivan D Micic; Milorad B Mitkovic; Il-Hyung Park; Desimir B Mladenovic; Predrag M Stojiljkovic; Zoran B Golubovic; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-11-05

Review 7.  Management of Subtrochanteric Proximal Femur Fractures: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Christopher Jackson; Mina Tanios; Nabil Ebraheim
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-10-28

Review 8.  Subtrochanteric femur fractures: current review of management.

Authors:  Ian Garrison; Grayson Domingue; M Wesley Honeycutt
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-02-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.