Literature DB >> 17620034

Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening: how does stool DNA testing fare?

Paul C Schroy1, Subodh Lal, Julie T Glick, Patricia A Robinson, Philippe Zamor, Timothy C Heeren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient preferences for 1 of the recommended colorectal cancer screening options or stool DNA testing (sDNA), a novel noninvasive screening test. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of ambulatory-care patients in the primary care setting.
METHODS: A decision aid was administered to eligible subjects, using a trained interviewer format. The decision aid described the pros and cons of colonoscopy, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy plus FOBT, double-contrast barium enema, and sDNA. After reviewing the decision aid, subjects were asked to identify a preferred screening option, test features influencing their choice, and level of interest in decision making.
RESULTS: A total of 263 subjects completed the study. Colonoscopy (50.6%), sDNA (28.1%), and FOBT (18.3%) were preferred over the other screening options. Preferences were associated with race and education but not age, sex, or prior FOBT. Subjects who preferred colonoscopy rated accuracy as the most influential test feature, whereas those who preferred sDNA or FOBT rated concerns about discomfort or frequency of testing highest. Most subjects preferred a shared (54%) or patient-dominant (34%) decision-making process.
CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy was the most frequently preferred screening option for average risk individuals. Noninvasive stool-based tests, particularly sDNA, were identified by most individuals who preferred an alternative to colonoscopy. These findings affirm the need to elicit patient preferences when selecting a screening option and suggest that provider-patient decision making can be tailored to include fewer options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17620034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  27 in total

1.  Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and screening test use in a large multispecialty primary care practice.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; Ronald Myers; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences among Black and Latino Primary Care Patients.

Authors:  Sumedha V Chablani; Noah Cohen; Drusilla White; Steven H Itzkowitz; Katherine DuHamel; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-10

Review 3.  Molecular markers for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Brandon T Dickinson; John Kisiel; David A Ahlquist; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Paul C Schroy; Karen Emmons; Ellen Peters; Julie T Glick; Patricia A Robinson; Maria A Lydotes; Shamini Mylvanaman; Stephen Evans; Christine Chaisson; Michael Pignone; Marianne Prout; Peter Davidson; Timothy C Heeren
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Informed decision making changes test preferences for colorectal cancer screening in a diverse population.

Authors:  Navkiran K Shokar; Carol A Carlson; Susan C Weller
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Patient and Provider Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: How Does CT Colonography Compare to Other Modalities?

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Sharmeel K Wasan; Timothy C Heeren; Paul C Schroy
Journal:  Int J Canc Prev       Date:  2011

7.  Stool DNA testing to screen for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Karen M Kuntz; Amy B Knudsen; Janneke A Wilschut; Ann G Zauber; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Patient perceptions of stool DNA testing for pan-digestive cancer screening: a survey questionnaire.

Authors:  Dennis Yang; Shauna L Hillman; Ann M Harris; Pamela S Sinicrope; Mary E Devens; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Stool DNA Analysis is Cost-Effective for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

Authors:  John B Kisiel; Gauree G Konijeti; Andrew J Piscitello; Tarun Chandra; Thomas F Goss; David A Ahlquist; Francis A Farraye; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Aid-assisted decision making and colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul C Schroy; Karen M Emmons; Ellen Peters; Julie T Glick; Patricia A Robinson; Maria A Lydotes; Shamini R Mylvaganam; Alison M Coe; Clara A Chen; Christine E Chaisson; Michael P Pignone; Marianne N Prout; Peter K Davidson; Timothy C Heeren
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.