Literature DB >> 17619931

Variation in the use of percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis of breast abnormalities in Ontario.

Claire M B Holloway1, Refik Saskin, Muriel Brackstone, Lawrence Paszat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative diagnosis of breast abnormalities is currently the standard of care. A population-based study to determine the use of percutaneous needle biopsy for breast diagnosis in Ontario was performed.
METHODS: A total of 17,068 women undergoing breast tissue sampling (percutaneous needle biopsy or surgical excision) for diagnosis between April 1, 2002, and December 31, 2002, and without a previous cancer diagnosis were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined the association of age, residence in a particular local health integration network (LHIN), income quintile, urban or rural residence, primary care provider, any prior mammogram, and prior regular screening mammography, as well as whether the biopsy was initiated by a screening mammogram with different methods of tissue diagnosis.
RESULTS: A total of 10,459 women (61%) underwent percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis. A total of 10,131 women underwent surgery, of whom 6,637 received a benign diagnosis and 3,494 had cancer, for a benign-to-malignant ratio of 1.9:1. Women with cancer were slightly more likely to undergo percutaneous biopsy than women without (64.7% vs. 60.3%). There was variation among LHINs in the use of percutaneous biopsy (range, 24%-72%). Women with the highest incomes, urban residence, a primary care provider, or history of any prior mammography were more likely to receive percutaneous biopsy. On multivariate analysis, age 50 to 69 years, LHIN, urban residence, primary care provider, and screen-initiated evaluation were associated with percutaneous biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the use of percutaneous biopsy by factors unrelated to indications for biopsy indicate that strategies to identify and overcome barriers to its use are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17619931     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9362-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  9 in total

1.  Surgeon and Facility Variation in the Use of Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy in Texas.

Authors:  Nina P Tamirisa; Kristin M Sheffield; Abhishek D Parmar; Christopher J Zimmermann; Deepak Adhikari; Gabriela M Vargas; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Predictors of adjuvant treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma at the population level.

Authors:  D J Kagedan; M E Dixon; R S Raju; Q Li; M Elmi; E Shin; N Liu; A El-Sedfy; L Paszat; A Kiss; C C Earle; N Mittmann; N G Coburn
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Geographic variation and physician specialization in the use of percutaneous biopsy for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Claire M B Holloway; Refik Saskin; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Improving work-up of the abnormal mammogram through organized assessment: results from the ontario breast screening program.

Authors:  May Lynn Quan; Rene S Shumak; Vicky Majpruz; Claire M D Holloway; Frances P O'Malley; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Time trends and geographic variation in use of minimally invasive breast biopsy.

Authors:  Christopher J Zimmermann; Kristin M Sheffield; Casey B Duncan; Yimei Han; Catherine D Cooksley; Courtney M Townsend; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Core needle biopsy of breast cancer tumors increases distant metastases in a mouse model.

Authors:  Edward Gitau Mathenge; Cheryl Ann Dean; Derek Clements; Ahmad Vaghar-Kashani; Steffany Photopoulos; Krysta Mila Coyle; Michael Giacomantonio; Benjamin Malueth; Anna Nunokawa; Julie Jordan; John D Lewis; Shashi Ashok Gujar; Paola Marcato; Patrick W K Lee; Carman Anthony Giacomantonio
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Evaluating wait times from screening to breast cancer diagnosis among women undergoing organised assessment vs usual care.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Derek Muradali; Kristina M Blackmore; Courtney R Smith; Lucia Mirea; Vicky Majpruz; Frances P O'Malley; May Lynn Quan; Claire Mb Holloway
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Gradual adoption of needle biopsy for breast lesions in a rural state.

Authors:  Serena Murphy; Yi-Chuan Yu; Colleen Kerrigan; Brian Sprague; Michelle Sowden
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Clinical and prognostic factors associated with diagnostic wait times by breast cancer detection method.

Authors:  Amalia Plotogea; Anna M Chiarelli; Lucia Mirea; Maegan V Prummel; Nelson Chong; Rene S Shumak; Frances P O'Malley; Claire Mb Holloway
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-03-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.