Literature DB >> 17619888

Anatomical considerations in TNM staging and therapeutical procedures for low rectal cancer.

Felix Aigner1, Thomas Trieb, Dietmar Ofner, Raimund Margreiter, Alexander Devries, Andrew P Zbar, Helga Fritsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Separation of the mesoderm-derived muscular structures and the endoderm-derived structures of the hindgut and reclassification of their involvement based on their embryological origin may be of clinical importance in providing anatomical support for a more standardized perineal resection during abdominoperineal resection. The aim of this study was to utilize magnetic resonance images and histological studies of fetal and neonatal specimens to redefine the T3/T4 distinction by reassessment of the intersphincteric plane and the pelvic diaphragm as they pertain to cancer infiltration and as part of the embryological development of the pelvic floor muscles and their connective tissue compartments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pelvic floor anatomy was studied in seven newborn children and 120 embryos and fetuses. Anatomical data were completed by magnetic resonance imaging in 82 patients with T3 and T4 rectal cancers (64 T3, 18 T4; 35 women and 47 men) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced (T3 or T4) rectal cancers.
RESULTS: Clear demarcation between mesodermal and endodermal structures of the pelvic floor, which is equally evident in plastinated sections and magnetic resonance images, is already visible in early fetal stages. There is a constitutive overlap between the endoderm- and the ectoderm-derived components of the pelvic floor.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the current classification of rectal cancer staging is confusing, where the routinely used TNM classification system unnecessarily differentiates between embryologically identical muscular structures. Tumor spread along the musculature of the hindgut beyond the dentate line could possibly explain the occasional involvement of lymph nodes outside the conventional mesorectum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17619888     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0353-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  30 in total

1.  Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; H Putter; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Radiological findings do not support lateral residual tumour as a major cause of local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Syk; M R Torkzad; L Blomqvist; O Ljungqvist; B Glimelius
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Local recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer is associated with anterior position of the tumour.

Authors:  C L H Chan; E L Bokey; P H Chapuis; A A Renwick; O F Dent
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Excision of the levator muscles with external sphincter preservation in the treatment of selected low T4 rectal cancers.

Authors:  Claudio Fucini; Claudio Elbetti; Alessandra Petrolo; Donato Casella
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Staining of different tissues in thick epoxy resin-impregnated sections of human fetuses.

Authors:  H Fritsch
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1989-03

6.  Local recurrence after curative resection of cancer of the rectum without total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  M Killingback; P Barron; O F Dent
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy?

Authors:  Chien-Chih Chen; Rheun-Chuan Lee; Jen-Kou Lin; Ling-Wei Wang; Shung-Haur Yang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Total mesorectal excision and local recurrence: a study of tumour spread in the mesorectum distal to rectal cancer.

Authors:  N Scott; P Jackson; T al-Jaberi; M F Dixon; P Quirke; P J Finan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  The pathological assessment of mesorectal excision: implications for further treatment and quality management.

Authors:  P Hermanek; P Hermanek; W Hohenberger; M Klimpfinger; F Köckerling; T Papadopoulos
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Progress in diagnostics of anorectal disorders. Part I: anatomic background and clinical and neurologic procedures].

Authors:  F G Bader; R Bouchard; R Keller; L Mirow; R Czymek; J K Habermann; H Fritsch; H-P Bruch; U J Roblick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Analysis of super-low anterior resection for rectal cancer from a single center.

Authors:  Shao-liang Han; Xian Shen; Qi-Qiang Zeng; Sheng-chong Guo; Jun Cheng; Guan-bao Zhu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2010-09

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.