Literature DB >> 17619843

[Effect of disturbing factors on the specificity of exfoliative urinary cytology].

Y Busch1, F vom Dorp, M Schenck, R Rossi, J Witschier, H Rübben.   

Abstract

In the clarification of hematuria and subsequent treatment, a high specificity is expected from urinary cytology when no tumor is present, because false positive results lead to unnecessary diagnostic measures. The aim of this study was to investigate different disturbing factors to determine the specificity of urinary cytology and whether the specificity can be increased by cytometry. Out of 150 patients with no malignant disease, 125 were affected by the following disturbing factors: urinary infection, urolithiasis, transurethral electroresection, utilisation of hypo-osmolar flushing solution or administration of contrast agents. In 5 patients who were diagnosed with urinary infection or urolithiasis, the urine was falsely cytologically determined to be tumor positive, an error which was corrected by cytometric analysis. Therefore, cytometric analysis should be carried out in patients in whom a tumor has been cytologically diagnosed in order to increase the specificity of urinary cytology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17619843     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-007-1469-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy--part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up.

Authors:  G D Grossfeld; M S Litwin; J S Wolf; H Hricak; C L Shuler; D C Agerter; P R Carroll
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.

Authors:  D M Parkin; F Bray; J Ferlay; P Pisani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Validation of the diagnostic value of NMP22 BladderChek test as a marker for bladder cancer by photodynamic diagnosis.

Authors:  Stefan Tritschler; Sonja Scharf; Alexander Karl; Derya Tilki; Ruth Knuechel; Arndt Hartmann; Christian G Stief; Dirk Zaak
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Mass screening for urinary tract cancer with urine cytology.

Authors:  R Nemoto; T Kato; M Harada; K Shibata; M Kano
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of urinary cytology, and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometry and cytology on bladder washings during followup for bladder tumors.

Authors:  M Grégoire; Y Fradet; F Meyer; B Têtu; R Bois; G Bédard; R Charrois; A Naud
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Grading of transitional cell tumours of the urinary tract by urinary cytology.

Authors:  H Rübben; J Bubenzer; K Bökenkamp; W Lutzeyer; P Rathert
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1979-06-22

7.  Clinical evaluation of a multi-target fluorescent in situ hybridization assay for detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Michael F Sarosdy; Paul Schellhammer; Gary Bokinsky; Paul Kahn; Roberto Chao; Lawrence Yore; Joseph Zadra; Daniel Burzon; Gerald Osher; Julia A Bridge; Steven Anderson; Sonny L Johansson; Michael Lieber; Mark Soloway; Kerry Flom
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.