Literature DB >> 17618937

Prospective multicenter study of marginal bone level and soft tissue health of a one-piece implant after two years.

Kaj Finne1, Eric Rompen, Joseph Toljanic.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A novel 1-piece implant purported to provide for stable tissue support, immediate function, and immediate placement in extraction sockets has been developed. Stabilization of the marginal bone level over time requires documentation.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate marginal bone level differences and soft tissue health between the 1- and 2-year follow-up of a 1-piece implant design.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-two implants, restoring both single teeth and multiple edentulous situations, in 56 consecutively treated patients, were included. Marginal bone level was evaluated on radiographs made at implant insertion, 6-month follow-up, and annually thereafter. At 3-, 6-month, and 1-year follow-ups, presence of plaque and the soft tissue response were evaluated using plaque and bleeding on probing indexes. The papilla index was used to determine papilla size at implant insertion with the provisional restoration in place and at the insertion of the definitive restoration. The change over time in marginal bone level was analyzed with a 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) paired design with time as main effect (1 to 2 years) and subjects as block effect (alpha=.05).
RESULTS: One implant failure occurred, resulting in a 98.8% cumulative survival rate (CSR) for the follow-up time of 2 years. The mean (SD) change in bone level between years 1 and 2 was 0.08 mm (1.19) (95% CI-0.30 to 0.46) (P=.68), demonstrating a stable marginal bone level. Normal implant mucosa was noted for approximately 90% of the sites at the 1-year follow-up. The mean (SD) papilla score at placement was 1.3 (0.66) and increased to 1.7 (0.67) at insertion of the definitive prosthesis.
CONCLUSIONS: The stable marginal bone level and soft tissue health observed indicate that the 1-piece implant tested has the ability to preserve both hard and soft tissue. Based on the high implant survival rate and favorable tissue response, the 1-piece implant can be recommended for clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618937     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60011-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  4 in total

1.  Clinical and Radiographic Peri-Implant Parameters and Whole Salivary Interleukin-1β and Interleukin-6 Levels among Type-2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients with and without Peri-Implantitis.

Authors:  Mansour Al-Askar; Sumaiah Ajlan; Nuha Alomar; Nasser M Al-Daghri
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Sealing Capability and SEM Observation of the Implant-Abutment Interface.

Authors:  Fabio C Lorenzoni; Paulo G Coelho; Gerson Bonfante; Ricardo M Carvalho; Nelson R F A Silva; Marcelo Suzuki; Thelma Lopes Silva; Estevam A Bonfante
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-07-02

Review 3.  Should Quality of Glycemic Control Guide Dental Implant Therapy in Patients with Diabetes? Focus on: Peri-Implant Diseases.

Authors:  Salwa Aldahlawi; Dalia Nourah; Sebastiano Andreana
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2021-04-21

4.  Effectiveness of one-piece implants inserted in cuspid sites.

Authors:  Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.