Literature DB >> 17618928

Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparative pilot study of immediate loading versus delayed loading after two years.

Gregory Stephan1, Fabien Vidot, Renaud Noharet, Paul Mariani.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Treatment options for an increasing number of completely edentulous patients using fixed restorations may be limited due to anatomical or financial constraints.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was to compare immediate loading versus conventional delayed loading of implants placed for the retention of mandibular overdentures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-six subjects each received 3 implants placed in the symphysis area which were connected with a gold bar. In the experimental group (n=17), the 3 splinted implants were loaded 2 days after surgery; in the control group (n=9), the 3 implants were loaded 3 months after surgery using a conventional 2-stage approach. Recall appointments were scheduled every 3 months during the 2-year follow-up. The following clinical parameters were included and assessed: health of periimplant soft tissues using the bleeding index (BI), plaque index (PI), periimplant probing depth (PIPD), periimplant bone resorption as measured on panoramic radiographs, and implant stability using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). The Mann-Whitney test (alpha=.05) was used to compare each parameter in the 2 groups.
RESULTS: After 2 years, no implant failure was recorded in either group. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups after 2 years with regard to BI (P=.33), PI (P=.81), PIPD (P=.61), periimplant bone resorption (P=.32), or RFA (P=.06). After 1 year, periimplant bone loss (P=.05) and PIPD (P=.005) were increased in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate loading of 3 splinted implants retaining a mandibular overdenture shortens treatment time for prosthesis insertion and shows, after 2 years, results comparable with the delayed approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618928     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60017-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

Review 1.  Immediate loading of overdentures: systematic review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Lisiane Cristina Bannwart; Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira; Daniela Micheline dos Santos; Marcela Filié Haddad; Murillo Rezende Santos; Paula Uchoa Castilho
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07-05

2.  Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading.

Authors:  Sara Tavakolizadeh; Fariborz Vafaee; Masume Khoshhal; Zahra Ebrahimzadeh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Survival and Complications of Single Dental Implants in the Edentulous Mandible Following Immediate or Delayed Loading: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  M Kern; W Att; E Fritzer; S Kappel; R G Luthardt; T Mundt; D R Reissmann; M Rädel; M Stiesch; S Wolfart; N Passia
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Comparison of immediate and conventional loading protocols with respect to marginal bone loss around implants supporting mandibular overdentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minoru Sanda; Kenji Fueki; Pranjal Radke Bari; Kazuyoshi Baba
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2018-10-24

5.  Effect of neutral zone technique on marginal bone loss around implant-supported overdentures.

Authors:  Mahmoud Darwish; Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Kusai Baroudi
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015-12

6.  The patient general satisfaction of mandibular single-implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures: Study protocol for a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Manabu Kanazawa; Mariko Tanoue; Anna Miyayasu; Shin Takeshita; Daisuke Sato; Mari Asami; Thuy Vo Lam; Khaing Myat Thu; Ken Oda; Yuriko Komagamine; Shunsuke Minakuchi; Jocelyne Feine
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.