BACKGROUND: We evaluated the potential of bioluminescence imaging (BLI) for early tumor detection, demonstrating occult sites of disseminated disease and assessing disease progression in a murine model of neuroblastoma. METHODS: Neuroblastoma cells engineered to express the enzyme firefly luciferase were used to establish localized tumors and disseminated disease in SCID mice. Bioluminescent signal intensity was measured at serial time points, and compared with traditional methods of evaluating tumor growth. RESULTS: Bioluminescence imaging detected subcutaneous and retroperitoneal tumors weeks before they were palpable or appreciable by ultrasound. Bioluminescent signal intensity at both sites then paralleled tumor growth. After intravenous administration of tumor cells, BLI revealed disseminated disease in the liver, lungs, and bone marrow, again weeks before any gross disease was present. The presence of tumor within these sites at early time points was confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Finally, BLI permitted a real-time, noninvasive, quantitative method for following response to therapy in a model of minimal residual disease. CONCLUSION: Bioluminescence imaging detects tumor much earlier than traditional methods. In addition, it can detect, quantify, and follow micrometastasis in real-time during disease progression. This methodology is extremely valuable for studying tumor tissue tropism, mechanisms of metastasis, and response to therapy in murine tumor models.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the potential of bioluminescence imaging (BLI) for early tumor detection, demonstrating occult sites of disseminated disease and assessing disease progression in a murine model of neuroblastoma. METHODS:Neuroblastoma cells engineered to express the enzyme firefly luciferase were used to establish localized tumors and disseminated disease in SCIDmice. Bioluminescent signal intensity was measured at serial time points, and compared with traditional methods of evaluating tumor growth. RESULTS: Bioluminescence imaging detected subcutaneous and retroperitoneal tumors weeks before they were palpable or appreciable by ultrasound. Bioluminescent signal intensity at both sites then paralleled tumor growth. After intravenous administration of tumor cells, BLI revealed disseminated disease in the liver, lungs, and bone marrow, again weeks before any gross disease was present. The presence of tumor within these sites at early time points was confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Finally, BLI permitted a real-time, noninvasive, quantitative method for following response to therapy in a model of minimal residual disease. CONCLUSION: Bioluminescence imaging detects tumor much earlier than traditional methods. In addition, it can detect, quantify, and follow micrometastasis in real-time during disease progression. This methodology is extremely valuable for studying tumor tissue tropism, mechanisms of metastasis, and response to therapy in murinetumor models.
Authors: Marleen Keyaerts; Carola Heneweer; Lea O Tchouate Gainkam; Vicky Caveliers; Bradley J Beattie; Geert A Martens; Christian Vanhove; Axel Bossuyt; Ronald G Blasberg; Tony Lahoutte Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Wayne S Orr; Jason W Denbo; Karim R Saab; Adrianne L Myers; Catherine Y Ng; Junfang Zhou; Christopher L Morton; Lawrence M Pfeffer; Andrew M Davidoff Journal: Surgery Date: 2012-01-28 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Mackenzie C McGee; J Blair Hamner; Regan F Williams; Shannon F Rosati; Thomas L Sims; Catherine Y Ng; M Waleed Gaber; Christopher Calabrese; Jianrong Wu; Amit C Nathwani; Christopher Duntsch; Thomas E Merchant; Andrew M Davidoff Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Sabine Mueller; Xiaodong Yang; Theo L Sottero; Ashley Gragg; Gautam Prasad; Mei-Yin Polley; William A Weiss; Katherine K Matthay; Andrew M Davidoff; Steven G DuBois; Daphne A Haas-Kogan Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2011-04-16 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Youngho Seo; W Clay Gustafson; Shorouk F Dannoon; Erin A Nekritz; Chang-Lae Lee; Stephanie T Murphy; Henry F VanBrocklin; Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; William A Weiss; Katherine K Matthay Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Shannon F Rosati; Regan F Williams; Lindsey C Nunnally; Mackenzie C McGee; Thomas L Sims; Lorraine Tracey; Junfang Zhou; Meiyun Fan; Catherine Y Ng; Amit C Nathwani; Clinton F Stewart; Lawrence M Pfeffer; Andrew M Davidoff Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: P Workman; E O Aboagye; F Balkwill; A Balmain; G Bruder; D J Chaplin; J A Double; J Everitt; D A H Farningham; M J Glennie; L R Kelland; V Robinson; I J Stratford; G M Tozer; S Watson; S R Wedge; S A Eccles Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Sabine Mueller; Samhita Bhargava; Annette M Molinaro; Xiaodong Yang; Ilan Kolkowitz; Aleksandra Olow; Noor Wehmeijer; Sharon Orbach; Justin Chen; Katherine K Matthay; Daphne A Haas-Kogan Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: W Maes; C Deroose; V Reumers; O Krylyshkina; R Gijsbers; V Baekelandt; J Ceuppens; Z Debyser; S W Van Gool Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-09-12 Impact factor: 4.130