OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of adrenocortical response to corticotropin in septic shock patients operated on exclusively for an intra-abdominal source of infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, observational, single-center study in a surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital PATIENTS: 118 consecutive septic shock patients undergoing laparotomy or drainage for intra-abdominal infection. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Baseline cortisol (t (0)) and cortisol response to corticotropin test (Delta) were measured during the first 24 h following onset of shock. The relationship between adrenal function test results and survival was analyzed as well as the effect of etomidate anesthesia. Cortisol plasma level at t (0) was higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors (33 +/- 23 vs. 25 +/- 14 microg/dl), but the response to corticotropin test did not differ between these two subgroups. ROC analysis showed threshold values for t (0) (32 microg/dl) and Delta (8 microg/dl) that best discriminated survivors from nonsurvivors in our population. We observed no difference in survival at the end of hospital stay using log rank test when patients were separated according to t (0), Delta, or both. In addition, adrenal function tests and survival did not differ in patients who received etomidate anesthesia (n = 69) during the surgical treatment of their abdominal sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with abdominal septic shock baseline cortisol level and the response to corticotropin test did not discriminate survivors from nonsurvivors. No deleterious impact of etomidate anesthesia on adrenal function tests and survival was observed in these patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of adrenocortical response to corticotropin in septic shockpatients operated on exclusively for an intra-abdominal source of infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, observational, single-center study in a surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital PATIENTS: 118 consecutive septic shockpatients undergoing laparotomy or drainage for intra-abdominal infection. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Baseline cortisol (t (0)) and cortisol response to corticotropin test (Delta) were measured during the first 24 h following onset of shock. The relationship between adrenal function test results and survival was analyzed as well as the effect of etomidate anesthesia. Cortisol plasma level at t (0) was higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors (33 +/- 23 vs. 25 +/- 14 microg/dl), but the response to corticotropin test did not differ between these two subgroups. ROC analysis showed threshold values for t (0) (32 microg/dl) and Delta (8 microg/dl) that best discriminated survivors from nonsurvivors in our population. We observed no difference in survival at the end of hospital stay using log rank test when patients were separated according to t (0), Delta, or both. In addition, adrenal function tests and survival did not differ in patients who received etomidate anesthesia (n = 69) during the surgical treatment of their abdominal sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with abdominal septic shock baseline cortisol level and the response to corticotropin test did not discriminate survivors from nonsurvivors. No deleterious impact of etomidate anesthesia on adrenal function tests and survival was observed in these patients.
Authors: G Zanetti; D Heumann; J Gérain; J Kohler; P Abbet; C Barras; R Lucas; M P Glauser; J D Baumgartner Journal: J Immunol Date: 1992-03-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: J L Moran; M J Chapman; M S O'Fathartaigh; A R Peisach; P R Pannall; P Leppard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: B Chernow; H R Alexander; R C Smallridge; W R Thompson; D Cook; D Beardsley; M P Fink; C R Lake; J R Fletcher Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 1987-07
Authors: Jacob E Sunshine; Steven Deem; Noel S Weiss; N David Yanez; Stephen Daniel; Katherine Keech; Marcia Brown; Miriam M Treggiari Journal: Respir Care Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.258
Authors: Chad E Wagner; Julian S Bick; Daniel Johnson; Rashid Ahmad; Xue Han; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Mias Pretorius Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Brian H Cuthbertson; Charles L Sprung; Djillali Annane; Sylvie Chevret; Mark Garfield; Serge Goodman; Pierre-Francois Laterre; Jean Louis Vincent; Klaus Freivogel; Konrad Reinhart; Mervyn Singer; Didier Payen; Yoram G Weiss Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Antoine J Cherfan; Hani M Tamim; Abdulrahman AlJumah; Asgar H Rishu; Abdulmajeed Al-Abdulkareem; Bandar A Al Knawy; Ali Hajeer; Waleed Tamimi; Riette Brits; Yaseen M Arabi Journal: BMC Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-12-30
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-01-04 Impact factor: 17.440