BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Both parasympathetic tone and atrial tachycardia (AT) remodelling of ion channels play important roles in atrial fibrillation (AF) pathophysiology. Different muscarinic cholinergic receptor (mAChR) subtypes (M2, M3, M4) in atrial cardiomyocytes are coupled to distinct K+-currents (called IKM2, IKM3, IKM4, respectively). Pulmonary veins (PVs) are important in AF and differential cholinergic current responses are a potential underlying mechanism. This study investigated AT-induced remodelling of mAChR subtypes and K+-currents in left-atrial (LA) and PV cardiomyocytes. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Receptor expression was assayed by western blot. IKM2, IKM3 and IKM4 were recorded with whole-cell patch-clamp in LA and PV cardiomyocytes of nonpaced control dogs and dogs after 7 days of AT-pacing (400 bpm). KEY RESULTS: Current densities of IKM2, IKM3 and IKM4 were significantly reduced by AT-pacing in LA and PV cardiomyocytes. PV cardiomyocyte current-voltage relations were similar to LA for all three cholinergic currents, both in control and AT remodelling. Membrane-protein expression levels corresponding to M2, M3 and M4 subtypes were decreased significantly (by about 50%) after AT pacing. Agonist concentration-response relations for all three currents were unaffected by AT pacing. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: AT downregulated all three mAChR-coupled K+-current subtypes, along with corresponding mAChR protein expression. These changes in cholinergic receptor-coupled function may play a role in AF pathophysiology. Cholinergic receptor-coupled K+-currents in PV cardiomyocytes were similar to those in LA under control and AT-pacing conditions, suggesting that differential cholinergic current properties do not explain the role of PVs in AF.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Both parasympathetic tone and atrial tachycardia (AT) remodelling of ion channels play important roles in atrial fibrillation (AF) pathophysiology. Different muscarinic cholinergic receptor (mAChR) subtypes (M2, M3, M4) in atrial cardiomyocytes are coupled to distinct K+-currents (called IKM2, IKM3, IKM4, respectively). Pulmonary veins (PVs) are important in AF and differential cholinergic current responses are a potential underlying mechanism. This study investigated AT-induced remodelling of mAChR subtypes and K+-currents in left-atrial (LA) and PV cardiomyocytes. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Receptor expression was assayed by western blot. IKM2, IKM3 and IKM4 were recorded with whole-cell patch-clamp in LA and PV cardiomyocytes of nonpaced control dogs and dogs after 7 days of AT-pacing (400 bpm). KEY RESULTS: Current densities of IKM2, IKM3 and IKM4 were significantly reduced by AT-pacing in LA and PV cardiomyocytes. PV cardiomyocyte current-voltage relations were similar to LA for all three cholinergic currents, both in control and AT remodelling. Membrane-protein expression levels corresponding to M2, M3 and M4 subtypes were decreased significantly (by about 50%) after AT pacing. Agonist concentration-response relations for all three currents were unaffected by AT pacing. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: AT downregulated all three mAChR-coupled K+-current subtypes, along with corresponding mAChR protein expression. These changes in cholinergic receptor-coupled function may play a role in AF pathophysiology. Cholinergic receptor-coupled K+-currents in PV cardiomyocytes were similar to those in LA under control and AT-pacing conditions, suggesting that differential cholinergic current properties do not explain the role of PVs in AF.
Authors: James Kneller; Renqiang Zou; Edward J Vigmond; Zhiguo Wang; L Joshua Leon; Stanley Nattel Journal: Circ Res Date: 2002-05-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Joachim R Ehrlich; Tae-Joon Cha; Liming Zhang; Denis Chartier; Peter Melnyk; Stefan H Hohnloser; Stanley Nattel Journal: J Physiol Date: 2003-07-07 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Dora E Benavides-Haro; Ricardo A Navarro-Polanco; José A Sánchez-Chapula Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2003-09-05 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Joachim R Ehrlich; Tae-Joon Cha; Liming Zhang; Denis Chartier; Louis Villeneuve; Terence E Hébert; Stanley Nattel Journal: J Physiol Date: 2004-03-12 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Ricardo A Navarro-Polanco; Iván A Aréchiga-Figueroa; Pedro D Salazar-Fajardo; Dora E Benavides-Haro; Julio C Rodríguez-Elías; Frank B Sachse; Martin Tristani-Firouzi; José A Sánchez-Chapula; Eloy G Moreno-Galindo Journal: J Physiol Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Jordi Heijman; Dorit Kirchner; Franziska Kunze; Eva Maria Chrétien; Martina B Michel-Reher; Niels Voigt; Michael Knaut; Martin C Michel; Ursula Ravens; Dobromir Dobrev Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Zhibing Lu; Benjamin J Scherlag; Jiaxiong Lin; Guodong Niu; Kar-Ming Fung; Lichao Zhao; Muhammad Ghias; Warren M Jackman; Ralph Lazzara; Hong Jiang; Sunny S Po Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2008-06-23
Authors: Peter Hanna; Eric Buch; Stavros Stavrakis; Christian Meyer; John D Tompkins; Jeffrey L Ardell; Kalyanam Shivkumar Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 10.787