Literature DB >> 1761823

Controlling large malpractice claims: the unexpected impact of damage caps.

W P Gronfein1, E D Kinney.   

Abstract

Indiana's comprehensive malpractice reforms, inaugurated in 1975, include a cap on damages, a mandated medical review before trial, and a state insurance fund to pay claims equal to or greater than $100,000. We have found that the amount of compensation going to claimants with such large malpractice claims in Indiana is, on average, substantially higher than in Michigan and Ohio. Indiana's mean claim severity between 1977 and 1988 was $404,832, while the means for Michigan and Ohio were $290,022 and $303,220, respectively, with the difference between these three means being highly significant. Although data on claim and claimant characteristics reveal considerable interstate variation, the results of regression analyses show that Indiana claim payment amounts are higher than Michigan or Ohio payments, independent of the effect of factors such as sex, age, severity of injury, allegations of negligence, and year of settlement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1761823     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-16-3-441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  1 in total

Review 1.  Damages caps in medical malpractice cases.

Authors:  Leonard J Nelson; Michael A Morrisey; Meredith L Kilgore
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.911

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.