Literature DB >> 17618148

Mip/LIN-9 can inhibit cell proliferation independent of the pocket proteins.

Mark Pilkinton1, Raudel Sandoval, Kelly Barrett, Xinyong Tian, Oscar R Colamonici.   

Abstract

Progression through the G1-phase of the cell cycle requires that cyclin D and CDK4 phosphorylate pRB and the other pocket proteins, p107 and p130. Cyclin E and CDK2 further phosphorylate pRB to complete its inactivation and allow the cell to enter S-phase. These phosphorylation events lead to the inactivation of the antiproliferative effect of the pocket proteins. The pocket proteins are the main targets of CDK4, and its unregulated activity can contribute to carcinogenesis. Mip/LIN9 is a recently described protein with growth suppressor, as well as growth promoting effects due to its ability to stabilize B-Myb and induce genes required for S phase and mitosis. The finding that a mutation that deletes the first 84 amino acids of Mip/LIN-9 corrects the defects of the CDK4 knockout mouse suggests that it should have a growth repressor effect that is blocked by CDK4. However, overexpression of cyclin D only partially blocks the inhibitory effect of Mip/LIN-9 on cell proliferation. Here, we performed experiments to further understand the antiproliferative effect of Mip/LIN-9 within the context of the pocket proteins. Our results suggest that there is a pocket protein-independent mechanism of the Mip/LIN-9 antiproliferative effect since it can be observed in cells with ablation of the three members of the family, and in NIH3T3 cells expressing the adenovirus E1A-12S protein. Altogether, the independence from the pocket proteins and the partial blockade of the antiproliferative effect produced by expression of cyclin D suggest that the role of Mip/LIN-9 downstream of CDK4 may be more closely related to the activation of B-Myb and the induction of S/M genes. Importantly, the regulatory effect of CDK4 is not due to direct phosphorylation of Mip/LIN-9 by this kinase or even CDK2, suggesting an indirect mechanism such as phosphorylation of the pocket proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618148      PMCID: PMC2184568          DOI: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2007.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis        ISSN: 1079-9796            Impact factor:   3.039


  33 in total

1.  Targeted disruption of the three Rb-related genes leads to loss of G(1) control and immortalization.

Authors:  J Sage; G J Mulligan; L D Attardi; A Miller; S Chen; B Williams; E Theodorou; T Jacks
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Regulation of G(1) cell-cycle progression by oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes.

Authors:  Alan Ho; Steven F Dowdy
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Combinatorial roles for pRB, p107, and p130 in E2F-mediated cell cycle control.

Authors:  M Classon; S Salama; C Gorka; R Mulloy; P Braun; E Harlow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The restriction point of the cell cycle.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny; Arthur B Pardee
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Differential regulation of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein by G(1) cyclin-dependent kinase complexes in vivo.

Authors:  S A Ezhevsky; A Ho; M Becker-Hapak; P K Davis; S F Dowdy
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Targeted disruption of CDK4 delays cell cycle entry with enhanced p27(Kip1) activity.

Authors:  T Tsutsui; B Hesabi; D S Moons; P P Pandolfi; K S Hansel; A Koff; H Kiyokawa
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Mechanisms by which DNA tumor virus oncoproteins target the Rb family of pocket proteins.

Authors:  Anna-Marija Helt; Denise A Galloway
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Transgenic expression in mouse lung reveals distinct biological roles for the adenovirus type 5 E1A 243- and 289-amino-acid proteins.

Authors:  Yongping Yang; Colin McKerlie; Steven H Borenstein; Zhan Lu; Marco Schito; John W Chamberlain; Manuel Buchwald
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  C. elegans class B synthetic multivulva genes act in G(1) regulation.

Authors:  Mike Boxem; Sander van den Heuvel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Transcription of meiotic cell cycle and terminal differentiation genes depends on a conserved chromatin associated protein, whose nuclear localisation is regulated.

Authors:  H White-Cooper; D Leroy; A MacQueen; M T Fuller
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  4 in total

1.  Perspectives in cell cycle regulation: lessons from an anoxic vertebrate.

Authors:  Kyle K Biggar; Kenneth B Storey
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.236

2.  Deletion of the p107/p130-binding domain of Mip130/LIN-9 bypasses the requirement for CDK4 activity for the dissociation of Mip130/LIN-9 from p107/p130-E2F4 complex.

Authors:  Raudel Sandoval; Mark Pilkinton; Oscar R Colamonici
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 3.  MuvB: A Key to Cell Cycle Control in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Audra N Iness; Larisa Litovchick
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  RB, p130 and p107 differentially repress G1/S and G2/M genes after p53 activation.

Authors:  Amy E Schade; Martin Fischer; James A DeCaprio
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.