Literature DB >> 17617657

Forgetting as an active process: an FMRI investigation of item-method-directed forgetting.

Glenn R Wylie1, John J Foxe, Tracy L Taylor.   

Abstract

Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined the blood oxygen level-dependent response associated with intentional remembering and forgetting. In an item-method directed forgetting paradigm, participants were presented with words, one at a time, each of which was followed after a brief delay by an instruction to Remember or Forget. Behavioral data revealed a directed forgetting effect: greater recognition of to-be-remembered than to-be-forgotten words. We used this behavioral recognition data to sort the fMRI data into 4 conditions based on the combination of memory instruction and behavioral outcome. When contrasted with unintentional forgetting, intentional forgetting was associated with increased activity in hippocampus (Broadmann area [BA] 35) and superior frontal gyrus (BA10/11); when contrasted with intentional remembering, intentional forgetting was associated with activity in medial frontal gyrus (BA10), middle temporal gyrus (BA21), parahippocampal gyrus (BA34 and 35), and cingulate gyrus (BA31). Thus, intentional forgetting depends on neural structures distinct from those involved in unintentional forgetting and intentional remembering. These results challenge the standard selective rehearsal account of item-method directed forgetting and suggest that frontal control processes may be critical for directed forgetting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17617657     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  50 in total

Review 1.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Directed forgetting shares mechanisms with attentional withdrawal but not with stop-signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jonathan M Fawcett; Tracy L Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

3.  ERP dynamics underlying successful directed forgetting of neutral but not negative pictures.

Authors:  Anne Hauswald; Hannah Schulz; Todor Iordanov; Johanna Kissler
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Overcoming suppression in order to remember: contributions from anterior cingulate and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Brice A Kuhl; Itamar Kahn; Nicole M Dudukovic; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  The role of sleep in directed forgetting and remembering of human memories.

Authors:  Jared M Saletin; Andrea N Goldstein; Matthew P Walker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Forgetting under difficult conditions: Item-method directed forgetting under perceptual processing constraints.

Authors:  Tracy L Taylor; Jason Ivanoff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-01

7.  Retrieval-mediated directed forgetting in the item-method paradigm: the effect of semantic cues.

Authors:  Ivan Marevic; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 8.  A neuroanatomical model of prefrontal inhibitory modulation of memory retrieval.

Authors:  Brendan E Depue
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Blocking of irrelevant memories by posterior alpha activity boosts memory encoding.

Authors:  Hyojin Park; Dong Soo Lee; Eunjoo Kang; Hyejin Kang; Jarang Hahm; June Sic Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Do different salience cues compete for dominance in memory over a daytime nap?

Authors:  Sara E Alger; Shirley Chen; Jessica D Payne
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.