Literature DB >> 17617334

Does failure to visualize a sentinel node on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy predict a greater likelihood of axillary lymph node positivity?

Atilla Soran1, Jeffrey Falk, Marguerite Bonaventura, Donald Keenan, Gretchen Ahrendt, Ronald Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has become the standard of care for axillary staging in women with early-stage breast cancer. The purpose of the study was to investigate the hypothesis that nonvisualization of SLN on lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) predicts a subset of patients at risk of having a substantial burden of axillary tumor as evidenced by higher rate of lymph node involvement. STUDY
DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1,500 patients who underwent dual-tracer SLN mapping for breast cancer between 1999 and 2004. LSG were reported as negative or positive.
RESULTS: Ninety-one percent had axillary SLN(s) identified on LSG imaging. In 133 of 134 (99.3%) patients with a negative LSG, SLN(s) was identified intraoperatively either by blue dye or hand-held gamma detection. SLN was positive in 28.4% of LSG nonvisualized group and was positive in 29.1% of LSG visualized group (p>0.05). A significantly higher percentage of women older than 50 years of age had nonvisualization of SLN (p<0.0001). Body mass index (calculated as kg/m2) was >30 in 42.5% of LSG nonvisualized group and in 26.3% in LSG visualized group (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Failure to demonstrate axillary uptake by LSG appears to be related to technical factors and patient-related factors, such as body mass index and older age, but does not adversely affect SLN identification. The equivalent rate of positive SLNs in patients with a positive or negative LSG supports the null hypothesis that "failure to visualize" on LSG does not identify a subset of patients at higher risk of being axillary lymph node positive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17617334     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  7 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: comparison of fluorescence dye with traditional radiocolloid and blue.

Authors:  Andrea Papadia; Maria Luisa Gasparri; Alessandro Buda; Michael D Mueller
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Current status of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Stephanie Kurita; Drew A Torigian; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Sentinel lymph node mapping using SPECT/CT and gamma probe in endometrial cancer: an analysis of parameters affecting detection rate.

Authors:  Samine Sahbai; Florin-Andrei Taran; Annette Staebler; Diethelm Wallwiener; Christian la Fougère; Sara Brucker; Helmut Dittmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Anatomical breast imaging-derived parameters do not provide incremental information in prediction of nonvisualization of sentinel lymph nodes on lymphoscintigraphy.

Authors:  Youssef Chahid; Hein J Verberne; Edwin Poel; N Harry Hendrikse; Jan Booij
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 1.698

5.  What to Do with Non-visualized Sentinel Nodes? A Dutch Nationwide Survey Study.

Authors:  Nicole C Verheuvel; Adri C Voogd; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Rudi M H Roumen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Optimal imaging time for Tc-99m phytate lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ching-Chun Ho; Yu-Hung Chen; Shu-Hsin Liu; Hwa-Tsung Chen; Ming-Che Lee
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

7.  Risk factors for nonvisualization of the sentinel lymph node on lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Youssef Chahid; Xinbo Qiu; Ewoudt M W van de Garde; Hein J Verberne; Jan Booij
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.138

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.