Literature DB >> 17617210

Surveillance for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: is it effective in intermediate/advanced cirrhosis?

Franco Trevisani1, Valentina Santi, Annagiulia Gramenzi, Maria Anna Di Nolfo, Paolo Del Poggio, Luisa Benvegnù, Gianludovico Rapaccini, Fabio Farinati, Marco Zoli, Franco Borzio, Edoardo Giovanni Giannini, Eugenio Caturelli, Mauro Bernardi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Surveillance of cirrhotic patients for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), based on ultrasonography and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) measurement, is widely used. Its effectiveness depends on liver function, which affects the feasibility of treatments and cirrhosis-related mortality. We assessed whether patients with intermediate/advanced cirrhosis benefit from surveillance.
METHODS: We selected 468 Child-Pugh class B and 140 class C patients from the ITA.LI.CA database, including 1,834 HCC patients diagnosed from January 1987 to December 2004. HCC was detected in 252 patients during surveillance (semiannual 172, annual 80 patients; group 1) and in 356 patients outside surveillance (group 2). Survival of surveyed patients was corrected for the estimated lead time.
RESULTS: Child-Pugh class B: cancer stage (P < 0.001) and treatment distribution (P < 0.001) were better in group 1 than in group 2. The median (95% CI) survivals were 17.1 (13.5-20.6) versus 12.0 (9.4-14.6) months and the survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 yr were 60.4%versus 49.2%, 26.1%versus 16.1%, and 10.7%versus 4.3%, respectively (P= 0.022). AFP, gross pathology, and treatment of HCC were independent prognostic factors. Child-Pugh class C: cancer stage (P= 0.001) and treatment distribution (P= 0.021) were better in group 1 than in group 2. Nonetheless, median survival did not differ: 7.1 (2.1-12.1) versus 6.0 (4.1-7.9) months (P= 0.740).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest surveillance be offered to class B patients and maintained for class A patients who migrate to the subsequent class. Surveillance becomes pointless in class C patients probably because the poor liver function adversely affects the overall mortality and HCC treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17617210     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01395.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  31 in total

1.  Small HCCs identified by screening.

Authors:  Petr Pancoska; Massimo De Giorgio; Stefano Fagiuoli; Brian I Carr
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  What primary care providers need to know about hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Parul Dureja Agarwal
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-01-23

Review 3.  Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update.

Authors:  Masao Omata; Ann-Lii Cheng; Norihiro Kokudo; Masatoshi Kudo; Jeong Min Lee; Jidong Jia; Ryosuke Tateishi; Kwang-Hyub Han; Yoghesh K Chawla; Shuichiro Shiina; Wasim Jafri; Diana Alcantara Payawal; Takamasa Ohki; Sadahisa Ogasawara; Pei-Jer Chen; Cosmas Rinaldi A Lesmana; Laurentius A Lesmana; Rino A Gani; Shuntaro Obi; A Kadir Dokmeci; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B virus infection: for whom.

Authors:  Jihyun An; Han Chu Lee
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28

Review 5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: Where are we?

Authors:  Roberto Mazzanti; Umberto Arena; Renato Tassi
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2016-02-20

6.  A national survey of the provision of ultrasound surveillance for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  T J S Cross; A Villanueva; S Shetty; E Wilkes; P Collins; A Adair; R L Jones; M R Foxton; T Meyer; N Stern; U Warshow; N Khan; M Prince; S Khakoo; G J Alexander; S Khan; H Reeves; Aileen Marshall; R Williams
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-07

Review 7.  Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeyamani Ramachandran
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2014-04-21

Review 8.  The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri Recommendations.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar; Subrat K Acharya; Shivaram P Singh; Vivek A Saraswat; Anil Arora; Ajay Duseja; Mahesh K Goenka; Deepali Jain; Premashish Kar; Manoj Kumar; Vinay Kumaran; Kunisshery M Mohandas; Dipanjan Panda; Shashi B Paul; Jeyamani Ramachandran; Hariharan Ramesh; Padaki N Rao; Samir R Shah; Hanish Sharma; Ragesh B Thandassery
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2014-05-22

9.  Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation practice guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Saleh A Alqahtani; Faisal M Sanai; Ashwaq Alolayan; Faisal Abaalkhail; Hamad Alsuhaibani; Mazen Hassanain; Waleed Alhazzani; Abdullah Alsuhaibani; Abdullah Algarni; Alejandro Forner; Richard S Finn; Waleed K Al-Hamoudi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.485

10.  Surveillance programmes for hepatocellular carcinoma: evident-based medicine is not evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Alain Braillon
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.