Literature DB >> 17617069

Computer-aided systematized approach to pediatric ECG analysis.

Marcos S Molina1, Alexandre M Benjo, Alessandra I Molina, Desiderio Favarato, Nancy Tobias, Euler de Vilhena Garcia, José A F Ramires, Carlos Alberto Pastore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In pediatric electrocardiography (ECG), the correct classification of segments in the medical record is subjected to various components. A conventional analysis based either on the cardiologist's skills or a quick reference to a standard normality table may lead to mistakes and to an incorrect final medical diagnosis. In this study, the evaluation of 12 specific ECG segments (ES) is defined as segmental analysis (SA). We hypothesized that a computer-aided SA can provide better results for a correct classification of pediatric ECGs, compared to the conventional analysis. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of a computer-aided SA ECG diagnosis of pediatric patients by cardiologists.
METHODS: To validate the software, we selected four normal and one altered ECG as references, all with concordant reports given by two cardiologists using manual planimetry. Nineteen cardiology experts independently examined each of the five standard pediatric ECGs twice. First, the ECG was analyzed in the conventional form. Subsequently, the participants evaluated ECGs with our proposed computer-aided AS, by measuring the 12 specific ES in the grid paper and having their values entered into a custom-made software, in order to compare them with normality standards.
RESULTS: The computer-aided SA reduced ECG misreading or ECG misinterpretation errors by 83%. It also showed a more uniform, high-quality analysis of all ES (minimum of 92% correctly reviewed segments from normal pediatric ECGs) by all the participant cardiologists.
CONCLUSIONS: We consider the computer-aided SA for ECG evaluation in pediatric cardiology an efficient and safe complementary method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17617069      PMCID: PMC6932167          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2007.00167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  7 in total

1.  Electrocardiographic changes in the first week of life.

Authors:  K K DATEY; P E BHARUCHA
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1960-04

2.  Guidelines for the interpretation of the neonatal electrocardiogram. A task force of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  P J Schwartz; A Garson; T Paul; M Stramba-Badiale; V L Vetter; C Wren
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.

Authors:  Maya E Guglin; Deepak Thatai
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Joe E Wathen; Arleta B Rewers; Anji T Yetman; Michael S Schaffer
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Using 12-lead ECG and synthesized VCG in detection of right ventricular hypertrophy with terminal right conduction delay versus partial right bundle branch block in the pediatric population.

Authors:  S H Zhou; J Liebman; A M Dubin; P C Gillette; R E Gregg; E D Helfenbein; J M Lindauer
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  PEDMEANS: a computer program for the interpretation of pediatric electrocardiograms.

Authors:  P R Rijnbeek; M Witsenburg; A Szatmari; J Hess; J A Kors
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.438

7.  The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?

Authors:  C S Snyder; A L Fenrich; R A Friedman; C Macias; K O'Reilly; N J Kertesz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 1.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.