Literature DB >> 17616056

An evaluation of the relative efficacy of tulathromycin for the treatment of undifferentiated fever in feedlot calves in Nebraska.

Oliver C Schunicht1, Calvin W Booker, P Timothy Guichon, G Kee Jim, Brian K Wildman, Tom J Pittman, Tye Perrett.   

Abstract

A field trial was performed under commercial feedlot conditions in central Nebraska to assess the relative efficacy of tulathromycin (TULA) to florfenicol (FLOR) for the treatment of undifferentiated fever (UF) in feedlot calves that did not receive a metaphylactic antimicrobial or vaccines/bacterins containing Mannheimia haemolytica or Histophilus somni at feedlot arrival by comparing animal health, feedlot performance, and carcass characteristic variables. Two hundred recently weaned, auction market derived, crossbred beef calves that met the study-specific case definition of UF were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 experimental groups as follows: TULA, which received tulathromycin administered subcutaneously at the rate of 2.5 mg/kg body weight (BW) once at the time of allocation; or FLOR, which received florfenicol administered subcutaneously at the rate of 40 mg/kg BW once at the time of allocation. In terms of animal health, the first UF relapse (RR = 0.65), overall mortality (RR = 0.33), and BRD mortality (RR = 0.29) rates in the TULA group were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than in the FLOR group. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences between the TULA and FLOR groups for the other animal health variables measured. There was no significant (P > or = 0.05) difference in average daily gain between the TULA and FLOR groups. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in the overall distributions of quality grade and yield grade between the experimental groups; however, a significantly (P < 0.05) higher proportion of carcasses in the TULA group graded yield grade USDA-4 as compared with the FLOR group. In the economic analysis, the benefits observed resulted in an economic advantage of $52.50 USD/animal in the TULA group due to lower first UF relapse and overall mortality rates, even though the occurrence of yield grade USDA-4 carcasses increased and the initial UF treatment cost was higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17616056      PMCID: PMC1876186     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Vet J        ISSN: 0008-5286            Impact factor:   1.008


  24 in total

1.  Efficacy of tulathromycin in the treatment of bovine respiratory disease associated with induced Mycoplasma bovis infections in young dairy calves.

Authors:  Kevin S Godinho; Al Rae; G David Windsor; Nicola Tilt; Tim G Rowan; Simon J Sunderland
Journal:  Vet Ther       Date:  2005

2.  Efficacy of tulathromycin injectable solution for the treatment of naturally occurring Swine respiratory disease.

Authors:  Robert G Nutsch; Fred J Hart; Kathleen A Rooney; Daniel J Weigel; W Randal Kilgore; Terry L Skogerboe
Journal:  Vet Ther       Date:  2005

3.  Minimum inhibitory concentrations of tulathromycin against respiratory bacterial pathogens isolated from clinical cases in European cattle and swine and variability arising from changes in in vitro methodology.

Authors:  Kevin S Godinho; Sue G Keane; Ian A Nanjiani; Hafid A Benchaoui; Simon J Sunderland; M Anne Jones; Andrew J Weatherley; Thomas D Gootz; Tim G Rowan
Journal:  Vet Ther       Date:  2005

4.  Efficacy of tulathromycin compared with tilmicosin and florfenicol for the control of respiratory disease in cattle at high risk of developing bovine respiratory disease.

Authors:  Kathleen A Rooney; Robert G Nutsch; Terry L Skogerboe; Daniel J Weigel; Kimberly Gajewski; W Randal Kilgore
Journal:  Vet Ther       Date:  2005

5.  Efficacy of tulathromycin in the treatment and prevention of natural outbreaks of bovine respiratory disease in European cattle.

Authors:  Kevin S Godinho; Regina M-L G Wolf; John Sherington; Tim G Rowan; Simon J Sunderland; Nigel A Evans
Journal:  Vet Ther       Date:  2005

6.  A comparison of prophylactic efficacy of tilmicosin and a new formulation of oxytetracycline in feedlot calves.

Authors:  Oliver C Schunich; P Timothy Guichon; Calvin W Booker; G Kee Jim; Brian K Wildman; Bruce W Hill; Tracy I Ward; Stewart W Bauck; John A Jacobsen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.008

7.  A comparison of florfenicol and tilmicosin for the treatment of undifferentiated fever in feedlot calves in western Canada.

Authors:  G K Jim; C W Booker; P T Guichon; O C Schunicht; B K Wildman; J C Johnson; P W Lockwood
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.008

8.  Evaluation of florfenicol for the treatment of undifferentiated fever in feedlot calves in western Canada.

Authors:  C W Booker; G K Jim; P T Guichon; O C Schunicht; B E Thorlakson; P W Lockwood
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.008

9.  Comparison of a multivalent viral vaccine program versus a univalent viral vaccine program on animal health, feedlot performance, and carcass characteristics of feedlot calves.

Authors:  Oliver C Schunicht; Calvin W Booker; G Kee Jim; P Timothy Guichon; Brian K Wildman; Bruce W Hill
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.008

10.  Comparison of penicillin, oxytetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfadoxine in the treatment of acute undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease.

Authors:  G D Mechor; G K Jim; E D Janzen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.008

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of enrofloxacin and ceftiofur sodium for the treatment of relapse of undifferentiated fever/bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Sameeh M Abutarbush; Oliver C Schunicht; Brian K Wildman; Sherry J Hannon; G Kee Jim; Tracy I Ward; Calvin W Booker
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Economic assessments from experimental research trials of feedlot cattle health and performance: a scoping review.

Authors:  Andrea L Dixon; Christy J Hanthorn; Dustin L Pendell; Natalia Cernicchiaro; David G Renter
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Efficacy of Tulathromycin for the Treatment of Foals with Mild to Moderate Bronchopneumonia.

Authors:  D Rutenberg; M Venner; S Giguère
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Susceptibility to tulathromycin in Mannheimia haemolytica isolated from feedlot cattle over a 3-year period.

Authors:  Trevor W Alexander; Shaun Cook; Cassidy L Klima; Ed Topp; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.