Literature DB >> 17615297

A novel pathway that coordinates mitotic exit with spindle position.

Scott A Nelson1, John A Cooper.   

Abstract

In budding yeast, the spindle position checkpoint (SPC) delays mitotic exit until the mitotic spindle moves into the neck between the mother and bud. This checkpoint works by inhibiting the mitotic exit network (MEN), a signaling cascade initiated and controlled by Tem1, a small GTPase. Tem1 is regulated by a putative guanine exchange factor, Lte1, but the function and regulation of Lte1 remains poorly understood. Here, we identify novel components of the checkpoint that operate upstream of Lte1. We present genetic evidence in agreement with existing biochemical evidence for the molecular mechanism of a pathway that links microtubule-cortex interactions with Lte1 and mitotic exit. Each component of this pathway is required for the spindle position checkpoint to delay mitotic exit until the spindle is positioned correctly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17615297      PMCID: PMC1951770          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e07-03-0242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  40 in total

1.  Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens.

Authors:  M Fromont-Racine; J C Rain; P Legrain
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  The yeast U2A'/U2B complex is required for pre-spliceosome formation.

Authors:  F Caspary; B Séraphin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-11-02       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Using green fluorescent protein fusion proteins to quantitate microtubule and spindle dynamics in budding yeast.

Authors:  K S Bloom; D L Beach; P Maddox; S L Shaw; E Yeh; E D Salmon
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.441

4.  Identification of the proteins of the yeast U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  G Neubauer; A Gottschalk; P Fabrizio; B Séraphin; R Lührmann; M Mann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Aip3p/Bud6p, a yeast actin-interacting protein that is involved in morphogenesis and the selection of bipolar budding sites.

Authors:  D C Amberg; J E Zahner; J W Mulholland; J R Pringle; D Botstein
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  The EH-domain-containing protein Pan1 is required for normal organization of the actin cytoskeleton in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  H Y Tang; M Cai
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Cortical capture of microtubules and spindle polarity in budding yeast - where's the catch?

Authors:  Stephen M Huisman; Marisa Segal
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  A cytokinesis checkpoint requiring the yeast homologue of an APC-binding protein.

Authors:  L Muhua; N R Adames; M D Murphy; C R Shields; J A Cooper
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Mitotic spindle positioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is accomplished by antagonistically acting microtubule motor proteins.

Authors:  F R Cottingham; M A Hoyt
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-09-08       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  A morphogenesis checkpoint monitors the actin cytoskeleton in yeast.

Authors:  J N McMillan; R A Sia; D J Lew
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-09-21       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  9 in total

1.  Interpreting spatial information and regulating mitosis in response to spindle orientation.

Authors:  Daniel J Burke
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Fly meets yeast: checking the correct orientation of cell division.

Authors:  Gislene Pereira; Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 20.808

3.  Different levels of Bfa1/Bub2 GAP activity are required to prevent mitotic exit of budding yeast depending on the type of perturbations.

Authors:  Junwon Kim; Selma Sun Jang; Kiwon Song
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  The spindle position checkpoint requires positional feedback from cytoplasmic microtubules.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Moore; Valentin Magidson; Alexey Khodjakov; John A Cooper
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  A novel role for the GTPase-activating protein Bud2 in the spindle position checkpoint.

Authors:  Scott A Nelson; Anthony M Sanson; Hay-Oak Park; John A Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Monitoring spindle orientation: Spindle position checkpoint in charge.

Authors:  Ayse K Caydasi; Bashar Ibrahim; Gislene Pereira
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 5.130

7.  The spindle position checkpoint is coordinated by the Elm1 kinase.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Moore; Prakash Chudalayandi; Richard A Heil-Chapdelaine; John A Cooper
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  The cortical protein Lte1 promotes mitotic exit by inhibiting the spindle position checkpoint kinase Kin4.

Authors:  Daniela Trinca Bertazzi; Bahtiyar Kurtulmus; Gislene Pereira
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Lte1 contributes to Bfa1 localization rather than stimulating nucleotide exchange by Tem1.

Authors:  Marco Geymonat; Adonis Spanos; Geoffroy de Bettignies; Steven G Sedgwick
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 10.539

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.