Literature DB >> 17615171

Factors associated with survival probability in autopsy-proven frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

S X Xie1, M S Forman, J Farmer, P Moore, Y Wang, X Wang, C M Clark, H B Coslett, A Chatterjee, S E Arnold, H Rosen, J H T Karlawish, V M Van Deerlin, V M-Y Lee, J Q Trojanowski, M Grossman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical and pathological factors associated with survival in autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD).
METHODS: The final analysis cohort included 71 patients with pathologically proven FTLD, excluding patients with clinical motor neuron disease (MND), evaluated at the University of Pennsylvania or at the University of California, San Francisco. We assessed clinical and demographic features; cognitive functioning at presentation; genetic markers of disease; and graded anatomical distribution of tau, ubiquitin and amyloid pathology.
RESULTS: The tau-negative group (n = 35) had a median survival time of 96 months (95% CI: 72-114 months), whereas the tau-positive group (n = 36) had a median survival time of 72 months (95% CI: 60-84 months). Patients with tau-positive pathology across all brain regions had shorter survival than those with tau-negative pathology in univariate Cox regression analyses (Hazard ratio of dying = 2.003, 95% CI = 1.209-3.318, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Tau-positive pathology represents a significant risk to survival in FTLD, whereas tau-negative pathology is associated with a longer survival time when clinical MND is excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17615171     DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.110288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  19 in total

1.  What is the life expectancy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration?

Authors:  Chiadi U Onyike
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Bias induced by ignoring double truncation inherent in autopsy-confirmed survival studies of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Lior Rennert; Sharon X Xie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Occupational attainment influences survival in autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal degeneration.

Authors:  Lauren Massimo; Jarcy Zee; Sharon X Xie; Corey T McMillan; Katya Rascovsky; David J Irwin; Ann Kolanowski; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Primary Progressive Aphasia and Stroke Aphasia.

Authors:  Murray Grossman; David J Irwin
Journal:  Continuum (Minneap Minn)       Date:  2018-06

5.  Linguistic Aspects of Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Authors:  Murray Grossman
Journal:  Annu Rev Linguist       Date:  2017-10-20

Review 6.  The epidemiology of frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Chiadi U Onyike; Janine Diehl-Schmid
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04

7.  Biomarkers in the primary progressive aphasias.

Authors:  Murray Grossman
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 8.  The non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Murray Grossman
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Dementia induces correlated reductions in white matter integrity and cortical thickness: a multivariate neuroimaging study with sparse canonical correlation analysis.

Authors:  Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Lyle Ungar; James C Gee; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Myelin oligodendrocyte basic protein and prognosis in behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  David J Irwin; Corey T McMillan; EunRan Suh; John Powers; Katya Rascovsky; Elisabeth M Wood; Jon B Toledo; Steven E Arnold; Virginia M-Y Lee; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; John Q Trojanowski; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.