Literature DB >> 17614319

The electrophysiological muscle scan.

Joleen H Blok1, Annemieke Ruitenberg, Ellen M Maathuis, Gerhard H Visser.   

Abstract

This study aims to assess the potential of the electrophysiological muscle scan or stimulus-response curve as a diagnostic instrument. If stimulus intensity is gradually increased from subthreshold to supramaximal values, all motor units in a muscle are successively activated. Thus, by plotting response size versus stimulus intensity, an impression (scan) of the entire muscle can be obtained. We recorded 54 detailed scans from 34 patients and 11 healthy subjects, and analyzed them visually and quantitatively. The scan summarized much diagnostic information in a single picture. Specific patterns in or properties of the scan (steps, maximum, variability, decrements, stimulus intensities used) provide clinically relevant information regarding motor unit number, size, and stability, and neuromuscular transmission and axonal excitability. The scan can be recorded noninvasively in about 5 minutes and is fairly easy to interpret. Because it is built up from contributions of all functioning motor units, the scan shows if and how many large motor units are present. There is no sample bias. For these reasons, further exploration and exploitation of this tool in the clinical setting are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17614319     DOI: 10.1002/mus.20838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  9 in total

1.  Electrode position markedly affects knee torque in tetanic, stimulated contractions.

Authors:  Taian M Vieira; Paolo Potenza; Laura Gastaldi; Alberto Botter
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Recruitment order of quadriceps motor units: femoral nerve vs. direct quadriceps stimulation.

Authors:  Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Dissociated lower limb muscle involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Neil G Simon; Michael Lee; Jong Seok Bae; Eneida Mioshi; Cindy S-Y Lin; Casey M Pfluger; Robert D Henderson; Steve Vucic; Michael Swash; David Burke; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Peripheral nerve diffusion tensor imaging as a measure of disease progression in ALS.

Authors:  Neil G Simon; Jim Lagopoulos; Sita Paling; Casey Pfluger; Susanna B Park; James Howells; Thomas Gallagher; Michel Kliot; Robert D Henderson; Steve Vucic; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Assessment of Motor Units in Neuromuscular Disease.

Authors:  Robert D Henderson; Pamela A McCombe
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations.

Authors:  Ellen M Maathuis; Robert D Henderson; Judith Drenthen; Nicole M Hutchinson; Jasper R Daube; Joleen H Blok; Gerhard H Visser
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2012-06-18

7.  Changes in motor nerve excitability in acute phase Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Judith Drenthen; Badrul Islam; Zhahirul Islam; Quazi D Mohammad; Ellen M Maathuis; Gerhard H Visser; Pieter A van Doorn; Joleen H Blok; Hubert P Endtz; Bart C Jacobs
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  A novel 16p locus associated with BSCL2 hereditary motor neuronopathy: a genetic modifier?

Authors:  Esther Brusse; Danielle Majoor-Krakauer; Bianca M de Graaf; Gerhard H Visser; Sigrid Swagemakers; Agnita J W Boon; Ben A Oostra; Aida M Bertoli-Avella
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.660

9.  Dominant Heterogeneity of Upper and Lower Motor Neuron Degeneration to Motor Manifestation of Involved Region in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Jiaoting Jin; Fangfang Hu; Qiuli Zhang; Qiaoyi Chen; Haining Li; Xing Qin; Rui Jia; Li Kang; Yonghui Dang; Jingxia Dang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.