Literature DB >> 17614254

Cross-sectional imaging identifies flow-mediated vasodilatation more accurately compared with longitudinal imaging.

Farooq A Chaudhry1, Sripal Bangalore, Shrikanth Upadya, Ajay Shah, Hossein Eftekhari, Danny Pudpud, Chandra M Sehgal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate cross-sectional imaging to longitudinal plane imaging for measurement of flow-mediated dilatation (FMD).
BACKGROUND: Accurate and reproducible assessment of FMD as a measure of endothelial function has important implications. Conventional imaging of the brachial artery is in a longitudinal plane. However, the changes in vasodilatation seen are subtle and minimal (10%-20%) in healthy states with an even smaller change in diseased states, thus, affecting interobserver and intraobserver variability and reproducibility.
METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers (5 men, 4 women) between the ages of 25 and 65 years had baseline FMD measurements done using both longitudinal and cross-sectional imaging. Brachial artery was occluded by inflating the sphygmomanometer cuff on the arm at a pressure of 150 mm Hg for 5 minutes. The artery was imaged continuously for 5 minutes postdeflation. The images were recorded digitally on a computer and analyzed for area and diameter changes by user-guided semiautomated boundary detection method described by our group earlier.
RESULTS: The baseline measurements were normalized to 1.00 for both longitudinal and cross-sectional images. After cuff deflation, the mean longitudinal diameter increased to 1.10 +/- 0.04 versus 1.30 +/- 0.17 (P = .007) for the cross-sectional method. The mean longitudinal measurements were 85.7 +/- 13.9 pixels at baseline that increased to 94.3 +/- 13.1 pixels for a mean change of 8.6 +/- 3.1 pixels after cuff deflation, compared with a mean of 8577.4 +/- 2950.8 pixels that increased to 11120.5 +/- 3989.4 pixels for a mean change of 2543 +/- 1552 pixels by the cross-sectional method (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional imaging produced a much larger change in area and pixels compared with longitudinal imaging. This translates into greater sensitivity in detecting small changes produced by FMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17614254     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  2 in total

1.  Flow-mediated dilatation test using optoacoustic imaging: a proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Angelos Karlas; Josefine Reber; Gael Diot; Dmitry Bozhko; Maria Anastasopoulou; Tareq Ibrahim; Markus Schwaiger; Fabien Hyafil; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Brachial flow-mediated dilation by continuous monitoring of arterial cross-section with ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Zhen Chen; Laith R Sultan; Susan M Schultz; Theodore W Cary; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2019-06-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.