Literature DB >> 17613651

Regression models for method comparison data.

Graham Dunn1.   

Abstract

Regression methods for the analysis of paired measurements produced by two fallible assay methods are described and their advantages and pitfalls discussed. The difficulties for the analysis, as in any errors-in-variables problem lies in the lack of identifiability of the model and the need to introduce questionable and often naïve assumptions in order to gain identifiability. Although not a panacea, the use of instrumental variables and associated instrumental variable (IV) regression methods in this area of application has great potential to improve the situation. Large samples are frequently needed and two-phase sampling methods are introduced to improve the efficiency of the IV estimators.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17613651     DOI: 10.1080/10543400701329513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  5 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for computer algorithm comparisons.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Anthony P Reeves; Erich P Huang; Xiao-Feng Wang; Andrew J Buckler; Hyun J Grace Kim; Huiman X Barnhart; Edward F Jackson; Maryellen L Giger; Gene Pennello; Alicia Y Toledano; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Tatiyana V Apanasovich; Paul E Kinahan; Kyle J Myers; Dmitry B Goldgof; Daniel P Barboriak; Robert J Gillies; Lawrence H Schwartz; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  The clinical diagnostic accuracy of rapid detection of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection in intensive care using multipathogen real-time PCR technology.

Authors:  Paul Dark; Graham Dunn; Paul Chadwick; Duncan Young; Andrew Bentley; Gordon Carlson; Geoffrey Warhurst
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Fish consumption and mortality in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort.

Authors:  Dagrun Engeset; Tonje Braaten; Birgit Teucher; Tilman Kühn; H B Bueno-de-Mesquita; Max Leenders; Antonio Agudo; Manuela M Bergmann; Elisavet Valanou; Androniki Naska; Antonia Trichopoulou; Timothy J Key; Francesca L Crowe; Kim Overvad; Emily Sonestedt; Amalia Mattiello; Petra H Peeters; Maria Wennberg; Jan Håkan Jansson; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Laure Dossus; Laureen Dartois; Kuanrong Li; Aurelio Barricarte; Heather Ward; Elio Riboli; Claudia Agnoli; José María Huerta; María-José Sánchez; Rosario Tumino; Jone M Altzibar; Paolo Vineis; Giovanna Masala; Pietro Ferrari; David C Muller; Mattias Johansson; M Luisa Redondo; Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Karina Standahl Olsen; Magritt Brustad; Guri Skeie; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Variability of CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Stephanie J B Vos; Pieter Jelle Visser; Frans Verhey; Pauline Aalten; Dirk Knol; Inez Ramakers; Philip Scheltens; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Marcel M Verbeek; Charlotte E Teunissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Statistical conclusion validity: some common threats and simple remedies.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.