Literature DB >> 17613645

A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.

Lawrence Lin1, A S Hedayat, Wenting Wu.   

Abstract

This paper proposes several Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) indices to measure the agreement among k raters, with each rater having multiple (m) readings from each of the n subjects for continuous and categorical data. In addition, for normal data, this paper also proposes the coverage probability (CP) and total deviation index (TDI). Those indices are used to measure intra, inter and total agreement among all raters. Intra-rater indices are used to measure the agreement among the multiple readings from the same rater. Inter-rater indices are used to measure the agreement among different raters based on the average of multiple readings. Total-rater indices are used to measure the agreement among different raters based on individual readings. In addition to the agreement, the paper also assess intra, inter, and total precision and accuracy. Through a two-way mixed model, all CCC, precision and accuracy, TDI, and CP indices are expressed as functions of variance components, and GEE method is used to obtain the estimates and perform inferences for all the functions of variance components. Each of previous proposed approaches for assessing agreement becomes one of the special case of the proposed approach. For continuous data, when m approaches infinity, the proposed estimates reduce to the agreement indices proposed by Barnhart et al. (2005). When m = 1, the proposed estimate reduces to the ICC proposed by Carrasco and Jover (2003). When m = 1, the proposed estimate also reduces to the OCCC proposed by Lin (1989), King and Chinchilli (2001a) and Barnhart et al. (2002). When m = 1 and k = 2, the proposed estimate reduces to the original CCC proposed by Lin (1989). For categorical data, when k = 2 and m = 1, the proposed estimate and its associated inference reduce to the kappa for binary data and weighted kappa with squared weight for ordinal data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17613645     DOI: 10.1080/10543400701376498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  24 in total

1.  Overall indices for assessing agreement among multiple raters.

Authors:  Jeong Hoon Jang; Amita K Manatunga; Andrew T Taylor; Qi Long
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Clinician's Commentary on Hui et al.1.

Authors:  Susan Marzolini
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  [A new method for agreement evaluation based on AC1].

Authors:  Jing-Wen Zhang; Jun Xu; Sheng-Li An
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-04-20

4.  Development and Validation of an Objective, Passive Dietary Assessment Method for Estimating Food and Nutrient Intake in Households in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  Modou L Jobarteh; Megan A McCrory; Benny Lo; Mingui Sun; Edward Sazonov; Alex K Anderson; Wenyan Jia; Kathryn Maitland; Jianing Qiu; Matilda Steiner-Asiedu; Janine A Higgins; Tom Baranowski; Peter Olupot-Olupot; Gary Frost
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2020-02-07

5.  The total deviation index estimated by tolerance intervals to evaluate the concordance of measurement devices.

Authors:  Geòrgia Escaramís; Carlos Ascaso; Josep L Carrasco
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Health status in routine clinical practice: validity of the clinical COPD questionnaire at the individual patient level.

Authors:  Janwillem W H Kocks; Huib A M Kerstjens; Sandra L Snijders; Barbara de Vos; Jacqueline J Biermann; Peter van Hengel; Jaap H Strijbos; Henk E P Bosveld; Thys van der Molen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Elizabeth Gibbons; Paul W Stratford; Jordi Alonso; Donald L Patrick; Dirk L Knol; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  A Framework for Assessing Broad Sense Agreement Between Ordinal and Continuous Measurements.

Authors:  Limin Peng; Ruosha Li; Ying Guo; Amita Manatunga
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Assessing method agreement for paired repeated binary measurements administered by multiple raters.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Nan Lin; Jordan D Oberhaus; Michael S Avidan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Nonparametric estimation of broad sense agreement between ordinal and censored continuous outcomes.

Authors:  Tian Dai; Ying Guo; Limin Peng; Amita Manatunga
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.